2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10878-017-0146-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The computational complexity of QoS measures for orchestrations

Abstract: We consider Web services defined by orchestrations in the Orc language and two natural quality of services measures, the number of outputs and a discrete version of the first response time. We analyse first those subfamilies of finite orchestrations in which the measures are well defined and consider their evaluation in both reliable and probabilistic unreliable environments. On those subfamilies in which the QoS measures are well defined, we consider a set of natural related problems and analyse its computati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following example attempts to to grasp the relation between our approach and imprecise probabilities. Our next result provides a generalization of a similar result in [7]. We are able to include asymmetric parallelism in the bag semantics and devise a normal form.…”
Section: Orchestrations and Probabilistic Informationmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The following example attempts to to grasp the relation between our approach and imprecise probabilities. Our next result provides a generalization of a similar result in [7]. We are able to include asymmetric parallelism in the bag semantics and devise a normal form.…”
Section: Orchestrations and Probabilistic Informationmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…When it is clear from the context that S is faulty, we denote S F shortly as S. [7]. Assuming independence among executions, the probabilistic behaviour is given in the following table:…”
Section: Orchestrations and Probabilistic Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations