2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10484-009-9097-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Concealed Information Test as an Instrument of Applied Differential Psychophysiology: Methodological Considerations

Abstract: In this interpretative paper, I consider four sets of methodological issues that may be relevant to improving the concealed information test (CIT) as an instrument of applied differential psychophysiology. The first set has to do with psychophysiological measurement in the CIT (e.g., specific sensitivity testing in lab vs. field). Secondly, I consider the relationships between the psychological process of deception and the CIT. Thirdly, I consider the problem of laboratory-to-field generalization of the CIT, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The copyright holder for this preprint (which this version posted July 5, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.18.448944 doi: bioRxiv preprint responses (Gamer & Pertzov, 2018;Janisse & Bradley, 1980). In recent years, neuroimaging techniques, such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and stimulus-evoked brain potentials from electroencephalography (EEG), have become popular tools to record the reaction of the brain to stimuli in the CIT (Gamer, 2014;Ganis, 2014;Hu et al, 2011;Mameli et al, 2010;Zeki et al, 2004; but see also Furedy, 2009, for a note on applicability).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The copyright holder for this preprint (which this version posted July 5, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.18.448944 doi: bioRxiv preprint responses (Gamer & Pertzov, 2018;Janisse & Bradley, 1980). In recent years, neuroimaging techniques, such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and stimulus-evoked brain potentials from electroencephalography (EEG), have become popular tools to record the reaction of the brain to stimuli in the CIT (Gamer, 2014;Ganis, 2014;Hu et al, 2011;Mameli et al, 2010;Zeki et al, 2004; but see also Furedy, 2009, for a note on applicability).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted June 18, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.18.448944 doi: bioRxiv preprint imaging (fMRI), and stimulus-evoked brain potentials from electroencephalography (EEG), have become popular tools to record the reaction of the brain to the stimuli in the CIT (Gamer, 2014;Ganis, 2014;Hu et al, 2011;Mameli et al, 2010;Zeki et al, 2004). Although it might be noted that a measurement that is simpler and costs less, for example, electrodermal activity rather than fMRI, could be more easily adopted in forensic applications (Furedy, 2009), the CIT has proven capable of detecting concealed information across a range of measures (Ambach et al, 2010(Ambach et al, , 2019.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These measures include autonomic-nervous-system responses that indicate levels of arousal, such as heart rate, respiration, and electrodermal activity (Kleiner, 2002; Rosenfeld et al, 2007), as well as eye movements, such as fixations, saccades, blinks, and pupil responses (Gamer & Pertzov, 2018; Janisse & Bradley, 1980). In recent years, neuroimaging techniques, such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and stimulus-evoked brain potentials from electroencephalography (EEG), have become popular tools to record the reaction of the brain to stimuli in the CIT (Gamer, 2014; Ganis, 2014; Hu et al, 2011; Mameli et al, 2010; Zeki et al, 2004; but see also Furedy, 2009, for a note on applicability).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GKT is based on the assumption that suspects who possess knowledge about specific crime related details will be physiologically more reactive to crime-relevant questions than crime-irrelevant questions, by utilizing a series of multiple-choice questions, each having one crime-relevant question and several control questions (4). GKT relies on a solid scientific principle, called an orienting response (OR), which is an elicited response caused by a novel stimulus or a familiar stimulus with relevance or “signal value” (5, 6), and it has been shown that guilty knowledge has an added signal value (7). That is, people who have guilty knowledge show a stronger OR to crime-relevant questions than to other questions, whereas all questions elicit equivalent responses from truth tellers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%