1994
DOI: 10.1080/03637759409376321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The concept and the practices of discipline in contemporary organizational life

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
77
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
77
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…If power relations are conceived of as having a binary characteristic, then an actor is either active or passive. Conceiving of power as power-plays, rather than as non-binary power relationships, is a characteristic of what is labelled a post-modern view of organisations, referring to the application of a Foucauldian perspective on organisations (Barker and Cheney, 1994;Clegg, 1989). 4 The first level is the set of links between the firm (focal organisation) and its direct stakeholders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If power relations are conceived of as having a binary characteristic, then an actor is either active or passive. Conceiving of power as power-plays, rather than as non-binary power relationships, is a characteristic of what is labelled a post-modern view of organisations, referring to the application of a Foucauldian perspective on organisations (Barker and Cheney, 1994;Clegg, 1989). 4 The first level is the set of links between the firm (focal organisation) and its direct stakeholders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is not to say that schools would neglect these (and other) issues if rankings were non-existent. Rather it suggests that rankings help to create an "artificial order" (Foucault, 1978: 179) within business schools; an order which defines categories of knowledge that become self-justifying (Barker & Cheney, 1994).…”
Section: Rankings As Disciplinary Institutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Disciplinary control rests in human interaction and cannot be reduced to single individuals. Power is a practice of shaping relations among people and influencing the 'way of being' within organizations (Barker & Cheney, 1994). Our argumentation follows a Foucauldian perspective for two reasons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, the organization still has an interest in controlling the behavior of participants in these offline spaces. Here, disciplinary control, in which members self-monitor their behavior [55,54,23], emerges a powerful mechanism of organizational control. Fourth, it demonstrates that not all individuals in the crowd are subject to the same control mechanisms.…”
Section: Example Of Socio-ideological Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholars have noted a lack of conceptual consensus of informal approaches [10], contributing to development of several overlapping theories of socioideological control, including corporate culture, cultural control [52,53], clan mechanisms [9], disciplinary control [54,55], and identity-based control [20,23]. These theories are likewise differentiated by their intellectual traditions and ontological and epistemological orientations, including structural functionalism, post-structuralism, social constructivist, post-modernism, critical theory, positivism, and interpretism.…”
Section: Socio-ideological Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%