2009
DOI: 10.1080/13691450902945215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The concept of critical reflection: promises and contradictions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
164
0
13

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 216 publications
(178 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
164
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the notion of critical reflection has been developed and explored over the years, especially in the context of critical theory, poststructuralist and feminist literature, as an approach that recognizes and responds to power structures and relations in reflection processes (Brookfield, 2009;Harding, 1991;Pillow, 2015). Collectively, this work emphasizes that there is something more to critical reflection as an alternative to mere reflection.…”
Section: Implications Of Diffractive Analysis For Research Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the notion of critical reflection has been developed and explored over the years, especially in the context of critical theory, poststructuralist and feminist literature, as an approach that recognizes and responds to power structures and relations in reflection processes (Brookfield, 2009;Harding, 1991;Pillow, 2015). Collectively, this work emphasizes that there is something more to critical reflection as an alternative to mere reflection.…”
Section: Implications Of Diffractive Analysis For Research Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, it allowed for new perceptions of the work to emerge as we learned throughout the story-making process. We used narrative inquiry to generate the stories with participants from this study, making them socially constructed and interpreted narratives (Brookfield, 2009). Therefore, the perspectives generated in the research are based on the social and political reality of the participants (Brookfield & Holst, 2011).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We took a constructivist approach (Brookfield, 2009) for this research, which is important for two reasons. First, it placed practitioners as the experts of their own experiences and included them as co-creators of the knowledge presented in this research.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, none of the participants demonstrated that they engaged in transformational reflection whereby they reflected critically on the process of learning or the assumptions on which the mandated learning outcomes are based (Brookfield, 2009). Their reflections were focused on the "nuts and bolts" of teaching, leaving unquestioned the broader issues related to power structures, hegemony, and personal beliefs (Brookfield, 2009).…”
Section: Levels Of Reflection Used By the Pstsmentioning
confidence: 99%