In the current issue of the Journal of Clinical Hypertension, De Beus and colleagues investigated the effect of salt intake on blood pressure (BP) response after percutaneous renal denervation in patients with resistant hypertension. The authors found no relationship between baseline sodium excretion and change in BP. 1 Hypertension is one of the leading attributable risk factors for kidney disease and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.2 A subgroup of patients with hypertension do not achieve target BP levels despite concurrent use of three or more antihypertensive agents (one being diuretic). These patients are considered to have "resistant hypertension." The incidence of resistant hypertension ranges from 10% to 12%. 3 These patients have more target organ damage compared with patients with hypertension who achieve target BPs with treatment. There is no accepted therapeutic norm for these patients, which has created a longstanding therapeutic dilemma. Dietary sodium intake is also known to be related to sympathetic activity, and lower intake is associated with higher sympathetic drive.14 Conversely, efferent sympathetic activity directly increases tubular sodium absorption. 15 Thus, hypothetically, it can be concluded that renal sympathetic denervation can cause decreased vasoconstriction, renin release, and decreased sodium and water retention. In this context it can be hypothesized that sodium intake may be an important factor for the success of renal sympathetic denervation.These data, taken into account alongside the study in which deBeus and colleagues investigated the role of basal sodium intake on BP response after percutaneous renal denervation in patients with resistant hypertension, yielded no statistically significant relationship between baseline sodium excretion and change in BP. Percutaneous renal denervation decreased BP with similar salt intake, suggesting a decrease in salt sensitivity. However, the same decline in BP was also observed in the control group; thus, percutaneous renal denervation did not seem to impact this decrease in BP. 1 Although the study is informative, the results must be interpreted with caution.First, the generalizability of the study should be considered. The trial excluded patients with severe renal ınsufficiency (estimated glomerular filtration rate <20 mL/min per 1.73 m 2 ). The relationship