2011
DOI: 10.1016/s1644-9665(12)60176-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The concept of the ideal indoor environment in multi-attribute assessment of dwelling-houses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Various methods are available for supporting complex decisions in construction. Some of them are as follows: Kaklauskas et al (2012) proposed a Passive House model for quantitative and qualitative analyses; in Kuzman et al (2013) AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) was used to compare passive house construction types; Brown et al (2013) used decision making for assessing renovation; in the work of Bucoń and Sobotka (2015), the alternatives of residential building repair are evaluated, while Cannemi et al (2014), Bhanot and Jha (2012) used decision making as a support tool for policy making; in Kalibatas et al (2011Kalibatas et al ( , 2012, Zavadskas et al (2016) the indoor environment was evaluated from the perspective of an ideal alternative; in the work of Chen et al (2014) MADM was used for evaluating the impacts of VOC emissions in the US single-family houses; Hopfe et al (2013) assessed building performance; in Książek et al (2015) decision-making in construction project development was described; in Zagorskas et al (2014) MADM was used for evaluating thermal insulation alternatives of historical brick buildings in the Baltic Sea Region and Augutis et al (2014) used MADM for assessing energy infrastructure. The papers of Zavadskas et al (2014), Mardani et al (2015aMardani et al ( , 2015b presented the surveys of MADM methods.…”
Section: Using Madm Methods In Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various methods are available for supporting complex decisions in construction. Some of them are as follows: Kaklauskas et al (2012) proposed a Passive House model for quantitative and qualitative analyses; in Kuzman et al (2013) AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) was used to compare passive house construction types; Brown et al (2013) used decision making for assessing renovation; in the work of Bucoń and Sobotka (2015), the alternatives of residential building repair are evaluated, while Cannemi et al (2014), Bhanot and Jha (2012) used decision making as a support tool for policy making; in Kalibatas et al (2011Kalibatas et al ( , 2012, Zavadskas et al (2016) the indoor environment was evaluated from the perspective of an ideal alternative; in the work of Chen et al (2014) MADM was used for evaluating the impacts of VOC emissions in the US single-family houses; Hopfe et al (2013) assessed building performance; in Książek et al (2015) decision-making in construction project development was described; in Zagorskas et al (2014) MADM was used for evaluating thermal insulation alternatives of historical brick buildings in the Baltic Sea Region and Augutis et al (2014) used MADM for assessing energy infrastructure. The papers of Zavadskas et al (2014), Mardani et al (2015aMardani et al ( , 2015b presented the surveys of MADM methods.…”
Section: Using Madm Methods In Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last decade scientists and researchers have developed a set of new MCDM methods (Kaplinski & Tupenaite, 2011;Antucheviciene et al, 2011;Kaplinski & Tamosaitiene, 2010;Tamosaitiene et al, 2010). They modified methods and applied them to solve practical and scientific problems (Kalibatas et al, 2011;Ginevicius et al, 2008a;. Solving of modern decision making problems in most cases is based on integrated model of different approaches.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kalibatas et al (2011) used it in order to solve the problem of the assessment of dwellinghouses, determining the ideal indoor environment. Rudzianskaite-Kvaraciejiene et al (2010) evaluated the effectiveness of road investment projects.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%