2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2010.06.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The conceptual alternative design for ITER magnet gravity support using clamp bolt

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Totally more than 32 kinds of load cases/combinations were carried out. The detailed FEM analysis is reported elsewhere [1,2,3]. The results reveal that the maximum stress intensities of the ITER magnet GS structure are below the allowable stress limit of the materials, and the components of the gravity support have also enough fatigue strength against the cyclic loads of the overturning electromagnetic forces on the TF coils with 30000 cycles, and the GS structure is safe enough.…”
Section: Alternative Designmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Totally more than 32 kinds of load cases/combinations were carried out. The detailed FEM analysis is reported elsewhere [1,2,3]. The results reveal that the maximum stress intensities of the ITER magnet GS structure are below the allowable stress limit of the materials, and the components of the gravity support have also enough fatigue strength against the cyclic loads of the overturning electromagnetic forces on the TF coils with 30000 cycles, and the GS structure is safe enough.…”
Section: Alternative Designmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The frictional contact areas, i.e., among plates and two upper pressing bars, were applied to increase the friction and resist the separate sliding tendency during operation. The detailed structure design is reported elsewhere [1,2].…”
Section: Alternative Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details of the experiment set-up can be seen in [8]. Further test work will be finished in the near future.…”
Section: Redesign Of Gsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The forces in the the Y -and X-directions are applied on the mock-up by Y -hydraulic bolt tensioners and one X-hydraulic bolt tensioner, respectively and the forces (including the forces converted into the moments M x and M y ) in the Z-direction are applied by Z-hydraulic bolt tensioners. The series of torque can be separated into A, B, C and D areas [5] to simplify the moments in the X, Y and Z directions. The loads are scaled down from the GS assembly design loads by a ratio of 5/21, as listed in Table 1 [1] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%