2021
DOI: 10.1088/1748-0221/16/02/p02002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The conceptual design of the miniBeBe detector proposed for NICA-MPD

Abstract: We present the conceptual design for the miniBeBe detector proposed to be installed as a level-0 trigger for the TOF of the NICA-MPD . We discuss the design and the geometrical array of its sensitive parts, the read-out electronics as well as the mechanical support that is envisioned. We also present simulation results for p + p and Bi + Bi collisions to study its capabilities as a function of multiplicity both as a level-0 trigger for the TOF, as well as to serve as a beam-gas interaction veto and to locate t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The resolution of the centrality determination by BeBe detector of the expected collisions at NICA is 0.05-0.1 for centralities percentages between 20% and 100%. Indeed, as previously reported in [7], BeBe compensates for the low trigger efficiency in low multiplicity proton+proton collision events given by the Fast Forward Detector (FFD) [8]. In this work, it is shown that BeBe also compensates for the decrease of the resolution of the centrality determination for peripheral collisions given by the Forward Hadron Calorimeter (FHCAL) [9] (subsection 5.3).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The resolution of the centrality determination by BeBe detector of the expected collisions at NICA is 0.05-0.1 for centralities percentages between 20% and 100%. Indeed, as previously reported in [7], BeBe compensates for the low trigger efficiency in low multiplicity proton+proton collision events given by the Fast Forward Detector (FFD) [8]. In this work, it is shown that BeBe also compensates for the decrease of the resolution of the centrality determination for peripheral collisions given by the Forward Hadron Calorimeter (FHCAL) [9] (subsection 5.3).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…To study the trigger capabilities of BeBe detector two samples of 1 million events were generated using UrQMD Monte Carlo model [21,25] within MPDRoot framework [19]. We considered two reduced geometries with the closest proposed detector to the MPD interaction point, Mbb [7], FFD, and BeBe detectors. Another geometry configuration considered only Mbb and BeBe.…”
Section: Estimation Of Bebe Trigger Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work we have shown that ITR and, therefore, the TR are not constant, that is, they depend of the energy, type of particle, the interaction point, the location of the Scorer (also the number of them [1]) and the size and geometry of the plastic scintillator. The BC-404 plastic scintillator of small size exhibits an ITR close to 2 ps, which is also independent of the number of scorers [2]. While for big size, the ITR and TR vary and in particular increase compare with a small size.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Finally, we obtained the fit Gaussian distribution from the set of all mean values to obtain the σ parameter, which it represents the ITR. This technique has been compared with the experiment [1] and also is used to calculate the ITR for the MiniBeBe detector (described in the Section 6 in [2]).…”
Section: Intrinsic Time Resolution Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation