2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2021.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The concurrent validity and intrarater reliability of a hand-held dynamometer for the assessment of neck strength in semi-professional rugby union players

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
6
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our intrasession reliability results coincide with previous studies in semi-professional Rugby Union players using different devices, wherein intrasession reliability of make test isometric neck strength measures using a fixed-mounted handheld dynamometer was good to excellent for extension, flexion, and bilateral lateral flexion (ICC = 0.77-0.92), as well as when tested against a manual resistance in these four directions (ICC = 0.77-0.90) [22]. When the reliability was assessed in a break test fashion with a handheld dynamometer in a seated position in academy Rugby Union players, intrasession reliability was good but did not reach excellent across directions (ICC = 0.80-0.85) [11].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our intrasession reliability results coincide with previous studies in semi-professional Rugby Union players using different devices, wherein intrasession reliability of make test isometric neck strength measures using a fixed-mounted handheld dynamometer was good to excellent for extension, flexion, and bilateral lateral flexion (ICC = 0.77-0.92), as well as when tested against a manual resistance in these four directions (ICC = 0.77-0.90) [22]. When the reliability was assessed in a break test fashion with a handheld dynamometer in a seated position in academy Rugby Union players, intrasession reliability was good but did not reach excellent across directions (ICC = 0.80-0.85) [11].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…These maximal isometric neck strength values are similar to those observed with amateur players assessed in a contact position using a load cell or fixed-frame dynamometer [32]. Our ranges were, however, greater than those from isometric neck strength values assessed in a cohort of semi-professional Rugby Union players tested using a mounted handheld dynamometer and a make test approach (range 17.3-23.5 kg) [22]. The difference potentially reflects the superior procedural methods of the load cell with harness and cable set-up than the handheld dynamometer set-up due to the testing interaction between the participant and examiner in the latter method [22].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This push mode has the disadvantage that examiner’s sex and strength influence the strength values (the reliability increases when the rater is stronger than the subject) [ 14 ]. Pull HHD consists of the patient pulling the HHD, which is generally attached to a rigid structure such as espalier, stretcher, or glass suction cup and showing to be also a reliable method [ 12 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 ]. Therefore, since this method requires a certain infrastructure and make it difficult to carry out certain movements, push HHDs is the type commonly used by clinicians.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In clinical practice, a dynamometer is a kind of popular quantifiable appliance for sports and rehabilitation training as it is simple to use, portable, and cost-effective. However, it can only be used to measure the strength of certain synergistic muscle groups ( Ashall et al, 2021 ; Tanveer et al, 2021 ), and it cannot be utilized to establish biomechanical studies on individual muscles in vivo .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%