2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.07.02.184127
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The condensation of HP1-α/Swi6 imparts nuclear stiffness

Abstract: SummaryLiquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) has emerged as a major driver of cellular organization. However, it remains unexplored whether the mechanical properties of LLPS domains are functionally important. The heterochromatin protein HP1-α (and the orthologous Swi6 in S. pombe) is capable of LLPS in vitro and promotes formation of LLPS heterochromatin domains in vivo.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…59 These factors alone or together could shape nuclear architecture and chromatin relocation. However, our findings are in agreement with the literature showing that the resulting alteration in H3K9me3heterochromatin organization increases local apparent viscosity near the periphery, 60 and an increase in viscosity is due to altered chromatin structure potentially from a condensed chromatin state in the nucleoplasm. 61 Further studies on nuclear softening 41,62 and epigenetic memory response 63 due to aligned configurations could provide exciting insights on chromatin organization.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…59 These factors alone or together could shape nuclear architecture and chromatin relocation. However, our findings are in agreement with the literature showing that the resulting alteration in H3K9me3heterochromatin organization increases local apparent viscosity near the periphery, 60 and an increase in viscosity is due to altered chromatin structure potentially from a condensed chromatin state in the nucleoplasm. 61 Further studies on nuclear softening 41,62 and epigenetic memory response 63 due to aligned configurations could provide exciting insights on chromatin organization.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Together, these observations suggest a complex physical picture that is dictated by both HP1α’s self-interaction and chromatin binding capabilities, in addition to length, concentration, and phase behavior of the chromatin itself ( Gibson et al, 2019 ; Maeshima et al, 2021 ; Strickfaden et al, 2020 ). The material state and categorization of the phase transition of HP1α-rich heterochromatin in vivo have been debated ( Erdel et al, 2020 ; Larson et al, 2017 ; Strom et al, 2017 ; Williams et al, 2020 ), and the underlying chromatin may be ‘solid-like’ ( Strickfaden et al, 2020 ), so further work is necessary to completely understand the interplay of these components in determining phase behavior and mechanics of the interphase nucleus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA–protein co-condensation not only provides mechanisms to facilitate enhancer–promoter contacts, but could also play a more general role in DNA compaction and maintenance of bulk chromatin rigidity in processes such as mitotic chromatid compaction 24 , and the formation of chromatin compartments 8,25,26 . Owing to the tension-dependent nature of DNA–protein co- condensation, our work suggests that these forces could play a key and, as yet, underappreciated role in genome organization and transcriptional initiation.…”
Section: Main Textmentioning
confidence: 99%