2019
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The ConDialInt Model: Condensation, Dialogality, and Intentionality Dimensions of Inner Speech Within a Hierarchical Predictive Control Framework

Abstract: Inner speech has been shown to vary in form along several dimensions. Along condensation, condensed inner speech forms have been described, that are supposed to be deprived of acoustic, phonological and even syntactic qualities. Expanded forms, on the other extreme, display articulatory and auditory properties. Along dialogality, inner speech can be monologal, when we engage in internal soliloquy, or dialogal, when we recall past conversations or imagine future dialogs involving our own voice as well as that o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
64
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 171 publications
(252 reference statements)
3
64
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, in novel (hence non-automatic) or difficult situations, the vividness of inner speech may be strengthened by increasing the speech motor activity, resulting in more salient auditory percepts. Relating this idea to the motor control framework we previously proposed (e.g., Loevenbruck et al, 2018;Grandchamp et al, 2019), it may be said that the characteristics of the task or situation (e.g., novelty, difficulty) may influence the amount of inhibition that is applied to motor commands during inner speech production, hence resulting in more or less visible peripheral muscular activity (see also a discussion of these ideas in the broader context of motor imagery, Guillot et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, in novel (hence non-automatic) or difficult situations, the vividness of inner speech may be strengthened by increasing the speech motor activity, resulting in more salient auditory percepts. Relating this idea to the motor control framework we previously proposed (e.g., Loevenbruck et al, 2018;Grandchamp et al, 2019), it may be said that the characteristics of the task or situation (e.g., novelty, difficulty) may influence the amount of inhibition that is applied to motor commands during inner speech production, hence resulting in more or less visible peripheral muscular activity (see also a discussion of these ideas in the broader context of motor imagery, Guillot et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With a theory of the neural bases for inner speech in hand, neuroimaging can then be conducted on a population of interest—such as those suffering from AVHs—to see whether activations associated with inner speech occur when AVHs are reported (Di Biase et al, 2019; McGuire et al, 1995; Shergill, 2003; Simons et al, 2010). Such imagining can also be used in tandem with subjective questionnaires that query a variety of qualitative and phenomenological features of inner speech, to explore the neural variations corresponding to variations in how inner speech appears to subjects from the first person perspective (Alderson‐Day, Mitrenga, Wilkinson, McCarthy‐Jones, & Fernyhough, 2018; Grandchamp et al, 2019; Kühn, Fernyhough, Alderson‐Day, & Hurlburt, 2014; McCarthy‐Jones & Fernyhough, 2011).…”
Section: Methods For Investigating Inner Speechmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an extensive review paper, Alderson‐Day and Fernyhough (2015) propose that inner speech can be defined as “the subjective experience of language in the absence of overt and audible articulation” (p. 1). Grandchamp et al (2019, p. 2) endorse this definition as well, adjusting it slightly to: “the subjective experience of verbalization in the absence of overt articulation or sign.” These definitions—with their appeal to “subjective experience”—highlight inner speech's close connection to introspection and first‐person experience. Nevertheless, most in cognitive science—including Alderson‐Day and Fernyhough, and Grandchamp et al .—do not assume that inner speech must occur consciously, nor that it must involve some attending “subjective experience.” And, certainly, when it comes to characterizing the phenomenon in a theory‐neutral way, it should not be assumed that inner speech must always have an attending “subjective experience.”…”
Section: What Is Meant By “Inner Speech”?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model also suggests that different forms of inner speech might involve the speech motor system to a different extent (Grandchamp et al, 2019;Loevenbruck, 2019). More precisely, highly expanded forms of inner speech (e.g., subvocally rehearsing a phone number) are hypothesised to recruit the speech apparatus to a greater extent than more evasive and more condensed forms of inner speech.…”
Section: Inducing Rumination In Different Modalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%