2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11408-013-0218-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The conditional performance of US mutual funds over different market regimes: do different types of ethical screens matter?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

7
32
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
7
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Areal et al (2013) study the performance of religious, socially responsible and irresponsible 4 US funds, based on a Markov-switching conditional model. Their results show that different kinds of ethical screens seem to lead to different performance patterns across different market regimes.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Areal et al (2013) study the performance of religious, socially responsible and irresponsible 4 US funds, based on a Markov-switching conditional model. Their results show that different kinds of ethical screens seem to lead to different performance patterns across different market regimes.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, there are arguments in favour of SRI funds performing better than conventional funds in times of crisis. Indeed, as pointed out by Areal, Cortez, and Silva (2013), we might question whether the higher reputation of socially responsible companies might protect their stocks from general price declines in times of crisis. If so, in downturn periods portfolios of socially responsible stocks should yield better performance relative to unscreened portfolios.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Renneboog et al (2008) measure negative performance of sustainability funds in the United States and many other countries. Areal et al (2013) find that the performance results for U.S. SRI funds are sensitive to the sample period considered. A more comprehensive overview of the methodological issues associated with the performance of sustainability funds can be found in Chegut et al (2011).…”
Section: Literature Review and Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 89%