2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2008.00280.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Condom Divide: Disenfranchisement of Malawi Women by Church and State

Abstract: Objective-To examine the impact of two mitigating social institutions, religious organizations and the state, on Malawi women's vulnerability to HIV.Design-In-depth interviews with a purposive sample of 40 central leaders from 5 faith based organizations (FBOs) in Malawi were recorded and transcribed as part of an on-going larger study. Qualitative description was used to identify themes and categories.Setting-Primarily urban and peri-urban areas of south-central Malawi.Participants-A minimum of 6 leaders from… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fact that there was little room to make mistakes and learn possibly resulted in a de facto lack of influence on member behaviors because it forced people to hide “bad” behavior. Finally, the expectations surrounding being a good Christian or Muslim inhibited open discussions about risky sexual behaviors and condoms as a strategy for HIV prevention (Rankin et al, 2008). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The fact that there was little room to make mistakes and learn possibly resulted in a de facto lack of influence on member behaviors because it forced people to hide “bad” behavior. Finally, the expectations surrounding being a good Christian or Muslim inhibited open discussions about risky sexual behaviors and condoms as a strategy for HIV prevention (Rankin et al, 2008). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, 49 PLWHs were qualitatively interviewed (Figure 2). Analysis of central leader data have been addressed elsewhere (Rankin, Lindgren, Kools, & Schell, 2008), and PLWH data are not included in this report. Interviews (both in-depth and quantitative survey questionnaires) were conducted in settings that were convenient and confidential for the respondent.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study adds significantly to the literature on engagement with faith-based organisations (FBOs) for effective HIV and AIDS prevention interventions in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), an area of inquiry that is all too lacking (Lindgren et al, 2013;Olowu, 2015;Swidler & Watkins, 2017;Trinitapoli, 2009). It contributes to explicating impact of existing interventions, and addresses some major barriers that have hampered HIV-prevention efforts such as FBOs' anti-condom and abstinence-only messaging (Banda, 2017;Mukuka & Slonim-Nevo, 2006;Piot, Kazatchkine, Dybul, & Lob-Levyt, 2009;Rankin et al, 2008), emphasis on spiritual, rather than antiretroviral therapy (ART) for PLWH (Endeshaw et al, 2017;Kenworthy, Thomann, & Parker, 2018;Wanyama et al, 2007), fear of VCT (Jurgensen, Tuba, Fylkesnes, & Blystad, 2012) and stigmatisation of PLWH (Alubo, Zwandor, Jolayemi, & Omundu, 2010;Ansari & Gaestel, 2010;Rankin, Brennan, Schell, Laviwa, & Rankin, 2005;Williams, Haire, & Nathan, 2017). Other qualitative work has addressed the ongoing role that stigma plays in preventing uptake of VCT among Zambians (Jurgensen et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This is partly due to researchers' and interventionists' growing appreciation for the centrality of religious identity among sub-Saharan Africans and the influence of religious leaders on congregants (Dilger, Burchardt, & Van Dijk, 2011;Fort, 2017;Trinitapoli, 2009). Collaborative efforts between FBOs and secularoften internationalorganisations to implement HIV and AIDS programmes in the region achieve varying degrees of success (Alubo, Zwandor, Jolayemi, & Omundu, 2010;Bazant & Boulay, 2007;Boyd, 2009;Endeshaw et al, 2017;Global Health Council, 2011;Lindgren et al, 2013;Prince, Denis, & Van Dijk, 2009;Rankin, Lindgren, Kools, & Schell, 2008;Swidler & Watkins, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, with the introduction of the maternity waiting homes, Barta & Kiene [ 34 ] argued that the practice of leaving young men at home presents an increased opportunity for infidelity. Furthermore, in most societies in Malawi, male infidelity is socially acceptable [ 35 ] and this leaves a woman helpless to suffer in silence. We assert that primigravid women in Malawi live in a hostile sociocultural environment and require concerted efforts to manage their fears.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%