1991
DOI: 10.1007/bf00123745
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Condorcet-Jefferson connection and the origins of social choice theory

Abstract: This paper explores the relationship between Condorcet and Jefferson to gain insight into the early development of social choice theory. Jefferson does not seem to have read or understood Condorcet's theoretical work, but studying the relationship leads to the identification of intellectual intermediaries and a different perspective on the creation of social choice theory in the French Academy of Sciences.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…... We have not observed any recognition of the repulsive peculiarities by which it is so undesirably distinguished." Yet recognition did come [5] some 170 years later for ideas on systems of voting within that book, of which an annotated English translation is now in preparation. Little known even…”
Section: School Of Mathematics and Statistics F 07 The University Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…... We have not observed any recognition of the repulsive peculiarities by which it is so undesirably distinguished." Yet recognition did come [5] some 170 years later for ideas on systems of voting within that book, of which an annotated English translation is now in preparation. Little known even…”
Section: School Of Mathematics and Statistics F 07 The University Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applications of this model are relevant to a wide variety of areas, such as medicine, law, management and others (cf. McLean and Hewitt [21], Nurmi [24], Grofman and Owen [14], Berend, Sapir and Sapir [9], Urken [30]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The social choice theory is buried in a few pages of the enormous Essai, and is not clearly related to the probabilistic conclusions of the bulk of the analysis. For this reason, most commentators, following Black (1958), have been stymied by an apparent dualism between the probabilistic and social choice content in Condorcet's theory, though recent analysts have discerned a unifying framework (see Urken, 1991).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%