2016
DOI: 10.1177/0533316416668429
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Conductor’s Self-disclosure of Negative Countertransference in Group Analytic Psychotherapy

Abstract: In this article, I will present the contribution of the conductor’s self-disclosure of negative countertransference in group analytic psychotherapy and its advantage over interpretation in the working through of projective identification that leads to a therapeutic impasse. I will also discuss the issues of timing of self-disclosure and spontaneity versus judicious self-disclosure. The presented ideas will be demonstrated through vignettes from analytic groups that I conduct.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…And finally: It seems that group analysts have already begun to think and communicate in relational terms. The following are some of our contemporary contributions: Relational moments of meeting, dialogue and witnessing (Schlapobersky, 2016); the question of self-disclosing of the conductor’s negative countertransference (Warhaftig-Aran, 2016), the group as a relational field (Weinberg, 2015; Weegmann 2014), relational perspective on the individual and society (Roseneil, 2013) and holding in relational terms (Yogev, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And finally: It seems that group analysts have already begun to think and communicate in relational terms. The following are some of our contemporary contributions: Relational moments of meeting, dialogue and witnessing (Schlapobersky, 2016); the question of self-disclosing of the conductor’s negative countertransference (Warhaftig-Aran, 2016), the group as a relational field (Weinberg, 2015; Weegmann 2014), relational perspective on the individual and society (Roseneil, 2013) and holding in relational terms (Yogev, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%