1940
DOI: 10.5840/thought194015410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Conference on Science Philosophy and Religion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After referencing suggestions that what was necessary was "a super-Thomas Aquinas or Maimonides, a genius capable of assimilating the mass of modern learning, imposing architectonic order upon it, and above all, enabling his system to adjust itself to the dynamic character of modern science," Finkelstein turned to Catholic philosopher Jacques Maritain's measured vision of a "pluralistic but well regulated universe of thought" that could foster "mutual respect and understanding" by formulating "significant analogies." 113 By tolerating a lack of closure on metaphysical questions, like how to "explain . .…”
Section: A Prophetic Guide For the American Mind And Spiritmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After referencing suggestions that what was necessary was "a super-Thomas Aquinas or Maimonides, a genius capable of assimilating the mass of modern learning, imposing architectonic order upon it, and above all, enabling his system to adjust itself to the dynamic character of modern science," Finkelstein turned to Catholic philosopher Jacques Maritain's measured vision of a "pluralistic but well regulated universe of thought" that could foster "mutual respect and understanding" by formulating "significant analogies." 113 By tolerating a lack of closure on metaphysical questions, like how to "explain . .…”
Section: A Prophetic Guide For the American Mind And Spiritmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wednesday morning, September 11, 1940, the penultimate session of the CSPR, at which the natural scientists presented their papers, proved to be a chance to test Finkelstein's blend of theistic and rational thought. Through comments and discussions, several scientists, philosophers, and theologians in the room debated the relative value and merits of science and religion for democratic thought.…”
Section: A Prophetic Guide For the American Mind And Spiritmentioning
confidence: 99%