The Conflict-Development Nexus: A Survey of Armed Conflicts in Sub-Saharan Africa 1980-2005

Abstract

This paper surveys the nexus between development and armed conflict in sub-Saharan Africa from 1980 to 2005. It focuses on war trends, impact of war on development, socioeconomic structures as war risks, and policy responses. Several findings emerge that challenge widely held state-centric assumptions that underpin contemporary analyses, data collection and policy priorities. These wars defy conventional analytical frameworks as they commingle state and non-state actors and political with economic and private motives. As the findings illustrate, the state is not a sufficient unit of analysis: more research, data collection and policy attention should be directed to non-state actors and wars and sub-national and cross-border impacts. War is development in reverse, yet in many of these wars, the national economy continued to grow and social indicators improved. At the same time, the destructive impacts were localised, implying that development gaps and horizontal inequalities worsened. Structural risk factors-horizontal inequalities, youth bulge and unemployment, environmental pressure and natural resource dependence-have played a causal or perpetuating role in the wars surveyed. Economic, social and governance reform policies can play a role in conflict prevention by addressing these risk factors, yet at present national and international policy priorities do not systematically address these risks. 2

Does Peacekeeping Reduce Violence? Assessing Comprehensive Security of Contemporary Peace Operations in Africa

“…We assume that higher levels in ODA have a stabilising effect on domestic forms of violence through having a positive effect on security governance. This assumption is based on the literature emerging around the security-development nexus (Fukuda et al 2008, Jackson 2015. Accordingly, development deprivation is an important contributing factor to violent conflict.…”

Critical Evolutions in the Peacebuilding-Development Praxis Nexus: Crisis and Complexity, Synergy and Transformation

“…Development (in the form of economic growth) axiomatically reduces conflict reflects assumptions that “development—improvements in people’s wealth or well-being, and increasingly governance—by definition promotes peace” (Uvin, 2002, p. 6). Debunking evidence, that is, that development is not conflict free (Stedman, 1995), has grown; while today, there is little debate that violent conflict fuels poverty and affects vulnerable populations disproportionately, considering the other side of the equation: Violent conflict is occurring in middle income countries, illustrating that wealth does not guarantee peace (UN-WB, 2018, p. xix). War can positively affect economic growth (Fukuda-Parr et al, 2008). Austerity-oriented development policies, that is, Structural Adjustment Programmes (SAPs) implemented across Latin America and Africa increased poverty and inequality in many contexts (Cheru, 2002).…”

“…Violent conflict is occurring in middle income countries, illustrating that wealth does not guarantee peace (UN-WB, 2018, p. xix). War can positively affect economic growth (Fukuda-Parr et al, 2008). Austerity-oriented development policies, that is, Structural Adjustment Programmes (SAPs) implemented across Latin America and Africa increased poverty and inequality in many contexts (Cheru, 2002).…”

Redevelopment of Inland Water Transport for Post-Conflict Reconstruction in Southern Sudan

“…Although the conflict in Sudan has been commonly attributed to historical, religious, or racial enmity, resource scarcity is in fact the cause. Drought and desertification have increased pressure on water and land resources, forcing group migration into areas historically settled by others (Fukuda-Parr et al 2008).…”