1936
DOI: 10.2307/409150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Conflict of Homonyms in English

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1952
1952
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The former achieves clarification by changing the spelling of the original word, while the latter replaces the original word with another existing word. This is not a unique situation, as noted by Menner (1936).…”
Section: Word Form Changes Caused By Homonymsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The former achieves clarification by changing the spelling of the original word, while the latter replaces the original word with another existing word. This is not a unique situation, as noted by Menner (1936).…”
Section: Word Form Changes Caused By Homonymsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The CAPP model takes a bottom-up approach in the articulation of 33 symptoms of psychopathy that have been canvassed through the theoretical and empirical literatures of the construct, as well as through considerable clinical experience (Cooke et al, 2012). The overall body of information was translated into trait-descriptive adjectives rooted in the lexical hypothesis, which proposes that the frequent use of particular adjectives indicate that they represent salient psychological phenomena (Menner, 1936; Saucier & Goldberg, 2001), and, therefore, symptoms were specified in the natural language of trait-descriptive adjectives. For the most part, this method was chosen because by relying on natural language elements for symptom definitions, cross-language and cross-cultural translation would be more straightforward and directly applicable.…”
Section: Comprehensive Assessment Of Psychopathic Personalitymentioning
confidence: 99%