1987
DOI: 10.1139/v87-363
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The conformational properties of some phenyl esters. Molecular orbital and nuclear magnetic resonance studies

Abstract: . Can. J. Chem. 65, 2175 (1987). Extensive, geometry-optimized, STO-3G MO computations on phenyl formate imply a strongly nonplanar Z conformer (C=O bond cis to the phenyl group) at ambient temperatures. The internal barrier to rotation about the C(1)-0 bond in this conformer is computed as v/k~mol-' = (-5.17 * 0.27) sin2 0 -(2.42 k 0.27) sin2 20, 0 being zero for the planar conformer; the twofold is nearly twice as large as the fourfold component. The expectation value of 0 is 58" at 300 K. The spin-spin coup… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The figure shows that the carbonyl groups of phenol esters do not lie in the planes of the benzene rings. Instead, the preferred angles a are 92 ± 26° and −90 ± 27°, in accord with previous NMR spectroscopic and theoretical analyses. , Steric repulsions between the carbonyl oxygens and the phenyl's C-2 hydrogens are thought to be the determinants. , Thus in 5 , the CO bond must point either down, toward the aromatic rings at the other end of the helicene, or up, away from the helicene framework. Both space-filling models and calculations to be described below, using the MacroModel molecular mechanics program with the MM3* force field, imply that the preferred orientation should be the latter, in which the carbonyl points away from the helicene framework.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The figure shows that the carbonyl groups of phenol esters do not lie in the planes of the benzene rings. Instead, the preferred angles a are 92 ± 26° and −90 ± 27°, in accord with previous NMR spectroscopic and theoretical analyses. , Steric repulsions between the carbonyl oxygens and the phenyl's C-2 hydrogens are thought to be the determinants. , Thus in 5 , the CO bond must point either down, toward the aromatic rings at the other end of the helicene, or up, away from the helicene framework. Both space-filling models and calculations to be described below, using the MacroModel molecular mechanics program with the MM3* force field, imply that the preferred orientation should be the latter, in which the carbonyl points away from the helicene framework.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The corresponding 3D overlay with the most similar training ligand (which was a phenyl methyl sulfone) shows ChEMBL318881 with the 4-fluorophenyl ester group both non-planar and in the E conformation. Although this may not be the lowest energy state, this conformation of a 4-fluorophenyl alkyl ester is not unreasonable [ 41 ].
Fig.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regardless, all chiral acids 7a-h (Scheme 5 panel A and Table 1) allowed the formation of diastereomeric esters 8a(a-h) (Scheme 5 panel A and Table 1) in good yields, in none of these cases it was possible to separate the diastereoisomeric mixtures by flash chromatography or crystallization. We thought, as suggested by literature data [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38], that functionalization of the cape-zone position keeps the chiral auxiliaries too far from the superimposition area of the terminal aryl rings vanishing separation. Thus, we moved to helicene 1b(OH), which allowed for the insertion of chiral auxiliaries on 1-position, ortho to the nitrogen atom, which we indicated as bay-zone, i.e., exactly in the area of terminal ring superimposition (Scheme 5B).…”
Section: Scheme 4 Synthesis Of Hydroxy Substituted Helicenes 1a(oh) A...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We thought, as suggested by literature data [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38], that functionalization of the capezone position keeps the chiral auxiliaries too far from the superimposition area of the terminal aryl rings vanishing separation. Thus, we moved to helicene 1b(OH), which allowed for the insertion of chiral auxiliaries on 1-position, ortho to the nitrogen atom, which we indicated as bay-zone, i.e., exactly in the area of terminal ring superimposition (Scheme 5B).…”
Section: Scheme 4 Synthesis Of Hydroxy Substituted Helicenes 1a(oh) A...mentioning
confidence: 99%