1994
DOI: 10.1016/0001-4575(94)90017-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The connection between risky driving and involvement in fatal accidents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
42
0
3

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
42
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Other risky driving behaviours such as racing other vehicles for thrills, close following and illegal passing, have also been associated with increased risk in a number of cohort, case control and cross-sectional studies Wasielewski, 1982, 1983;Preusser et al, 1991;Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, 1994;Rajalin, 1994;Harrison, 1997;Begg et al, 1999;Bell et al, 2000;Fergusson et al, 2003;Lam, 2003). Risky driving behaviours may be studied as 'acute' behaviours (a single incidence of a behaviour that is temporally related to the immediate risk of an injury crash) and/or 'habitual' (usual or ongoing) risky driving behaviours.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other risky driving behaviours such as racing other vehicles for thrills, close following and illegal passing, have also been associated with increased risk in a number of cohort, case control and cross-sectional studies Wasielewski, 1982, 1983;Preusser et al, 1991;Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, 1994;Rajalin, 1994;Harrison, 1997;Begg et al, 1999;Bell et al, 2000;Fergusson et al, 2003;Lam, 2003). Risky driving behaviours may be studied as 'acute' behaviours (a single incidence of a behaviour that is temporally related to the immediate risk of an injury crash) and/or 'habitual' (usual or ongoing) risky driving behaviours.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Offenses accurately identify factors contributing to crash occurrence, but occur more frequently than crashes [2,3], making them an excellent proxy measure of crash risk.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study is therefore based on the assumption that there exists a particular group of collisions in which one of the drivers involved (the one who committed an infraction) is more responsible than the other driver(s), or is more likely to be the responsible driver than are the drivers who committed no infraction (15). Although the relationship between committing an infraction and the risk of being involved in traffic crashes has been well established (20)(21)(22), the assumption that the infractor is responsible for the collision may not be true. However, the approach we used in the present study makes such an association plausible: in a collision in which only one of the drivers committed an infraction and the other involved drivers did not, the former driver is much more likely to have caused the accident (15).…”
Section: Methodological Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%