The conscious state of the dying patient: An integrative review

Abstract

Objectives The cognitive state of the dying in the last days of life may deteriorate, resulting in a reduced ability to communicate their care needs. Distressing symptoms, physical and existential, may go unrecognized and untreated. The objectives of this integrative review were to systematically interrogate the literature to determine the changing conscious state of dying adults and to identify changes in their care needs. Methods An integrative review protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020160475). The World Health Organization definition of palliative care informed the review. CINAHL, MEDLINE (OVID), Scopus, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, and PubMed were searched from inception to October 2019 using search strategies for each database. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied. Methodological quality was appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute Checklist for the Case Series appraisal tool. Extracted data were synthesized using a narrative approach. Results Of 5,136 papers identified, 11 quantitative case series studies were included. Six themes were identified: conscious state and change over time, awareness, pain, absence of holistic care, the voiceless patient, and signs and symptoms of dying. Significance of results In the last days of life, the physical and conscious state of the dying patient declines, resulting in an inability to express their care needs. Dignity in dying and freedom from pain and suffering are both an imperative and a human right; and unvoiced care needs can result in unnecessary suffering and distress. This review revealed that little is known about how healthcare professionals assess holistic care needs at this vulnerable time. Although much has been written about palliative and end-of-life care, the assessment of care needs when patients are no longer able to voice their own needs has largely been ignored, with little attention from clinical, educational, or research perspectives. This gap in evidence has important implications for the dying and their families.

A bioethical perspective on the meanings behind a wish to hasten death: a meta-ethnographic review

“…This can lead to feelings of hopelessness and despair and may contribute to a desire to end their life [ 50 , 52 , 53 ]. It is therefore not surprising that the meaning of dignity at the end-of-life has been mostly explored around the concept of dying with dignity and freedom from pain and suffering both as an ethical imperative and a human right, focusing on how to provide holistic care needs at this vulnerable time in a person’s life [ 78 ]. A dignified death includes respecting patients' values, beliefs, unique worldviews, social traditions, and cultural background [ 56 , 58 ].…”

“…Life as an intrinsic good, which is inherent to the ethical principle of dignity, and a peaceful death are also important values [ 8 , 79 ]. Interventions have been described in the literature to reduce psychosocial and existential distress, and promote dignity, meaning, hope, and peace of mind in patients at the end-of-life [ 78 , 80 , 81 ]. Hence, recognizing dignity while embracing a person-centered care approach can help professionals to identify and consequently address feelings and perceptions of compromised dignity.…”

‘How long do you think?’ Unresponsive dying patients in a specialist palliative care service: A consecutive cohort study

“…A decrease in conscious state (where the patient becomes unresponsive), has been accepted as a sign of imminent death, together with resulting swallowing difficulty and reduced oral intake. 9 – 11 Despite much research, such as clinician prediction of survival, 12 – 14 continuous monitoring and observation of signs and symptoms of imminent death 7 , 9 , 15 – 17 and the use of prognostic scales, 6 , 8 , 9 significant uncertainty in accurate prognostication remains in practice.…”

Decision‐making in nursing research and practice—Application of the Cognitive Continuum Theory: A meta‐aggregative systematic review

“…The findings from the meta-aggregation contribute to the proposed model.The proposed new model is centric rather than hierarchically stepped. This places the patient at the centre, because without centring the patient, the patient remains voiceless in decision-making regarding their care(O'Connor et al, 2022). Good quality health care involves ensuring the patient's values, needs and concerns are heard(Kwame & Petrucka, 2021).…”