The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument

Abstract

Background: COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments) is an initiative of an international multidisciplinary team of researchers who aim to improve the selection of outcome measurement instruments both in research and in clinical practice by developing tools for selecting the most appropriate available instrument. Method: In this paper these tools are described, i.e. the COSMIN taxonomy and definition of measurement properties; the COSMIN checklist to evaluate the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties; a search filter for finding studies on measurement properties; a protocol for systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments; a database of systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments; and a guideline for selecting outcome measurement instruments for Core Outcome Sets in clinical trials. Currently, we are updating the COSMIN checklist, particularly the standards for content validity studies. Also new standards for studies using Item Response Theory methods will be developed. Additionally, in the future we want to develop standards for studies on the quality of non-patient reported outcome measures, such as clinician-reported outcomes and performance-based outcomes. Conclusions: In summary, we plea for more standardization in the use of outcome measurement instruments, for conducting high quality systematic reviews on measurement instruments in which the best available outcome measurement instrument is recommended, and for stopping the use of poor outcome measurement instruments.

Ultrasound imaging in women's arm flexor muscles: intra-rater reliability of muscle thickness and echo intensity

“…Thus, a study using a more robust statistical approach including limits of agreement, larger sample size, and blinded raters are required 17 , 18 . Furthermore, according to Atkinson and Nevill 17 , US should be reliable enough to be used in a specific population.…”

Psychometric properties of Multidimensional Health Locus of Control - A and General Self-Efficacy Scale in civil servants: ELSA-Brasil Musculoskeletal Study (ELSA-Brasil MSK)

“…The targeted number of participants for test-retest reliability analyses was set at 300, representing three times the minimum sample size considered adequate by the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist 43 , 44 .…”

Responsiveness, Reliability, and Minimally Important and Minimal Detectable Changes of 3 Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Low Back Pain: Validation Study (Preprint)

“…Rasch analysis to examine item performance, or factor analysis to explore data dimensionality). Whereas COSMIN conflate internal consistency with reliability in their taxonomy, [10,84] we consider internal consistency to be an indication of the unidimensionality of a scale and of item redundancy, rather than the degree to which a scale is free from measurement error. As such, and with respect to the reliability definition, we preferred to consider it separately.…”