The consensus model for regulation of APRNs: Implications for nurse practitioners

Rounds, Linda R.; J, Zych; Mallary, Laura

doi:10.1111/j.1745-7599.2013.00812.x

Cited by 19 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The Consensus Model introduced the need for education realignment in some cases because certifications must be congruent with educational background. This meant that NPs practicing in areas other than their educational specialty area would need to go back to school and obtain the aligned specialty or be forced to find a job elsewhere (Rounds et al, 2013). The benefit is that the NP role and scope of practice will not change because of relocation (NCSBN, 2023).…”

Section: Implications For Nurse Practitioners Preceptors and Nurse Fa...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Education standards, accreditation, certification, and regulation of nurse practitioner practice

Savin

Newberry

2023

J Am Assoc Nurse Pract

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Many organizations play a role in creating, supporting, clarifying, and certifying the foundational documents for nurse practitioner (NP) education and practice. Quality standards for NP education are promulgated by the American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) and the National Organization of Nurse Practitioner Faculties (NONPF). Competency-based education, in the form of interactive learning, helps bridge the gap between theory and practice. In 2021, AACN released new competencies that correspond to 10 domains which reflect the uniqueness of the nursing profession and guide professional nursing education. The NONPF and AACN are co-facilitators of a multi-organizational group called the National Task Force (NTF) on quality nurse practitioner education that standardizes the general evaluation of NP education. In 2022, the NTF updated the evaluation standards in response to the new competencies. Schools are accredited by one of three agencies: The Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education, The Accreditation Commission for Education in Nursing, and The National League for Nursing Commission for Nursing Education Accreditation. The eight NP specialties each have their own certifying bodies. The National Council of State Boards of Nursing is involved in regulation of NPs. The purpose of this article is to update stakeholders, including NPs, preceptors, and nurse faculty, about the various agencies and guidelines that inform education standards, accreditation, certification, and regulation of NP practice. A review of recently published guidelines with a summary of implications is also presented.

show abstract

Section: Implications For Nurse Practitioners Preceptors and Nurse Fa...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Education standards, accreditation, certification, and regulation of nurse practitioner practice

Savin

Newberry

2023

J Am Assoc Nurse Pract

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Diverse opinions about the education and training requirement are another issue in Taiwan. These issues are barriers to optimal functioning of NPs, and eliminating inconsistencies about NP practice and NP preparation will promote the value of NP professionalism (Rounds, Zych, & Mallary, 2013).…”

Section: Issues Of Np Practice Prior To and During Legislationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Scope of practice and legislation for nurse practitioners in Taiwan

Chiu

Tsay

Tung

2015

Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The purpose of the article is to describe the scope of practice legislation in Taiwan, with some comparisons to the scope of practice legislation in the United States, as well as to identify the issues of nurse practitioner (NP) practice. Data sources A literature review was conducted to determine the limitations of the administrative directives used to govern NP scope of practice. A simultaneous review of authoritative resources, including the Ministry of Health and Welfare's administrative directives related to NP practice, the Physicians Act and Nurses Act of Taiwan, and the statement of the Taiwan Association of NPs, was conducted and the documents analyzed. Conclusion Based only on administrative directives, and without law and regulations, it was difficult to define the scope of practice. It was determined, however, that, since the addition of Paragraphs 3 and 4 of Article 23 of the Nurses Act, NPs became able to provide a high quality of care legally, which helps to facilitate the professionalism of NPs. Implications for practice Legislation still has a long way to go, and through sharing our findings on the NP legislation process, we hope to gain the support of NPs around the world and to encourage an understanding and the legislation of this new role.

show abstract

Evaluating models of healthcare delivery using the Model of Care Evaluation Tool (MCET)

Hudspeth¹,

Vogt

Wysocki

et al. 2016

Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and purpose Our aim was to provide the outcome of a structured Model of Care (MoC) Evaluation Tool (MCET), developed by an FAANP Best‐practices Workgroup, that can be used to guide the evaluation of existing MoCs being considered for use in clinical practice. Multiple MoCs are available, but deciding which model of health care delivery to use can be confusing. This five‐component tool provides a structured assessment approach to model selection and has universal application. Methods A literature review using CINAHL, PubMed, Ovid, and EBSCO was conducted. Conclusions The MCET evaluation process includes five sequential components with a feedback loop from component 5 back to component 3 for reevaluation of any refinements. The components are as follows: (1) Background, (2) Selection of an MoC, (3) Implementation, (4) Evaluation, and (5) Sustainability and Future Refinement. Implications for practice This practical resource considers an evidence‐based approach to use in determining the best model to implement based on need, stakeholder considerations, and feasibility.

show abstract

The consensus model for regulation of APRNs: Implications for nurse practitioners

Cited by 19 publications

References 12 publications

Education standards, accreditation, certification, and regulation of nurse practitioner practice

Education standards, accreditation, certification, and regulation of nurse practitioner practice

Scope of practice and legislation for nurse practitioners in Taiwan

Evaluating models of healthcare delivery using the Model of Care Evaluation Tool (MCET)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About