The Consequence of Ethical Criticism of Intelligence on Countering Terrorism in Indonesia

Abstract

The global war on terror has raised debates between liberals and realists on the position of ethics in intelligence operations. On the one hand, liberal ethicists insist that the conduct of intelligence gathering to counter terrorism must not violate the security rights of citizens. On the other hand, proponents of realism consider national security to be of greater importance than ethical principles governing individual freedom. This article tries to present an alternative point of view by examining the consequence of ethical criticisms of intelligence activities on the Indonesian government’s counterterrorism measures. It proposes two approaches to understanding the connection between ethics and intelligence: examining the nature of the terror threat, and looking at the sociopolitical situations which affect the role of the state’s security agencies. Arguably, securitizing intelligence by enforcing an ethical reconceptualization of intelligence roles increases the challenges facing Indonesia’s intelligence operatives and damages the effectiveness of the government’s counterterrorism policy.

The Principles of Islamic Law and the Deradicalization of Convicted Terrorists

“…Even in 2017, the Indonesian National Police handled 170 terrorism cases; the cases increased dramatically from the previous year, in which only 82 cases were registered. The National Counterterrorism Agency stated that there were 2.7 million Indonesians involved in a series of terror attacks, even though that number did not include followers and sympathizers of terrorist networks (Wicaksana 2019).…”