2018
DOI: 10.1177/0886260518786497
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Consequences of Crime in Company: Co-Offending, Victim–Offender Relationship, and Quality of Violence

Abstract: Peers influence offending, both directly through co-offending and indirectly through information and advice. Despite such findings, there has been only limited research into the ways in which the presence of other offenders (i.e., accomplices) may impact criminal behavior, especially violence. Drawing on research on small group behavior, this study explores the relationship between the presence of co-offenders and offense severity, focusing on weapon use and victim injury. More specifically, this research hypo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
31
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
31
1
Order By: Relevance
“…First, although useful, an examination of heterogeneity in arrest risk for all offenses in the NIBRS data would be beyond the scope of a single analysis. Because recent research has suggested that co-offending may be especially consequential in the production of violence (e.g., Lantz, 2018; Lantz & Kim, 2018; McGloin & Piquero, 2009), this research focuses on violent offenses as a starting point. Second, because the victim does not necessarily encounter the offender during property crimes, information regarding offender demographics—one of the primary foci of this research—are considerably more reliable for violent crimes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, although useful, an examination of heterogeneity in arrest risk for all offenses in the NIBRS data would be beyond the scope of a single analysis. Because recent research has suggested that co-offending may be especially consequential in the production of violence (e.g., Lantz, 2018; Lantz & Kim, 2018; McGloin & Piquero, 2009), this research focuses on violent offenses as a starting point. Second, because the victim does not necessarily encounter the offender during property crimes, information regarding offender demographics—one of the primary foci of this research—are considerably more reliable for violent crimes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent research on co-offending as collective behavior argues that the presence of co-offenders allows individuals to engage in behavior that they would never have engaged in had they been alone (Lantz, 2018; Lantz & Kim, 2019; McGloin & Piquero, 2009; Warr, 2002). More specifically, this research argues that being in the presence of other offenders changes the threshold for certain behaviors through various mechanisms, including the diffusion of responsibility among group members (Granovetter, 1978; McGloin & Rowan, 2015).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the group context, a diffusion of responsibility among the group changes individual behavior, and as group size increases, responsibility is further divided among group actors (McGloin & Rowan, 2015). The relative anonymity of each individual member within the group is also increased (Granovetter, 1978; Lantz, 2018). More specifically, as Diener, Lusk, DeFour, and Flax (1980) noted, in larger groups, the presence of more group members reduces the relative individuality of each group participant; this reduced individuality results in individuals who feel less responsible for their actions and the actions of the group as a whole.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations