“…First, on the one hand, prior studies have shown that crimes committed in greater temporal proximity showed greater behavioral consistency and that the likelihood of stranger sex offenders displaying behavioral consistency across their series decreased when looking at longer series of crimes (alison et al, 2010;grubin et al, 2001;see, however, Harbers, Deslauriers-Varin, Beauregard, & van der Kemp, 2012). On the other hand, prior studies show that greater levels of consistency are found in offenses committed later in the series investigated as the offenders have achieved a certain offending knowledge and expertise to commit their crime more successfully (grubin et al, 2001;sorochinski & salfati, 2010;Woodhams & labuschagne, 2011). second, due to the interactional nature of this offense, sexual assault is subject to situational and contextual influence and more prone to crime switching, as offenders might be unable to successfully perform their initial cognitive script and reach their goal. More specifically, previous studies have shown that the target selection process of sex offenders depends heavily on the social, physical, and geographic environment as well as the victim's behaviors and location prior to the crime (e.g., Beauregard, Proulx, rossmo, leclerc, & allaire, 2007;Canter & larkin, 1993;Deslauriers-Varin & Beauregard, 2010;rossmo, 1997).…”