2006
DOI: 10.1080/08878730609555383
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The “constant changing of myself”: Revising roles in undergraduate teacher preparation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Cook-Sather (2006), the role of professor in a PDS transforms into the role of facilitator and encourages dialogues between school and university constituencies. In the pilot used as the basis for this study, the professor helped develop quality lessons and encouraged other educators to apply current trends in class lessons and modeled inquiry-based instructional practices based on the NCATE standards.…”
Section: Professor Teacher and Teacher Candidate Rolesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…According to Cook-Sather (2006), the role of professor in a PDS transforms into the role of facilitator and encourages dialogues between school and university constituencies. In the pilot used as the basis for this study, the professor helped develop quality lessons and encouraged other educators to apply current trends in class lessons and modeled inquiry-based instructional practices based on the NCATE standards.…”
Section: Professor Teacher and Teacher Candidate Rolesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Originally supported by grants from the Ford Foundation and the Arthur Vining Davis Foundations, TLT has been fully supported by Bryn Mawr and Haverford Colleges since 2000. (See Cook‐Sather, 2002a, 2002b, 2006a, 2006b, 2007b, and 2009c for more complete discussions. )…”
Section: Teaching and Learning Together (Tlt)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rationale is that students are the intended beneficiaries of educational systems and should therefore be consulted at the very least, with others arguing for greater student involvement in curricular design and development (Cook-Sather 2002, Jenkins 2006, Levin 2000. The planned-enacted-experienced curriculum model (Erickson and Shultz 1992) positions students in relation to the educational intentions of educators, and has been utilised in various higher education studies (Aulls 2004, Cook-Sather 2006, Hawthorne 1998, Lerch 2004, Lyon 2004, Zidon 1996. The model has been represented visually as a nested diagram, as conceptualised in Figure 1 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%