1989
DOI: 10.1145/65943.65949
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The constituent object parser: syntactic structure matching for information retrieval

Abstract: The ConstituentObject Parser is a shallow syntactic parser designed to produce dependency tree representations of syntactic structure that can be used to specify the intended meanings of a sentence more precisely than can the key terms of the sentence alone. It is intended to improve the precision/ recall performance of information retrieval and similar text processing applications by providing more powerful matching procedures. The dependency tree representation and the relationship between the intended use o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The retrieval results from syntactic relation matching appears to be no better than the results obtainable using index phrases generated using statistical methods, such as those described by Fagan (1989). Metzler & Haas (1989), Metzler, Haas, Cosic & Weise (1990), Schwarz (1990), and Ruge, Schwarz, & Warner (1991) performed syntactic processing to produce dependency trees that indicate which terms modify which other terms. Smeaton & van Rijsbergen (1988) found that the premodifier-headnoun relation (e.g., adjective-noun) has a bigger impact on retrieval than other relations.…”
Section: Relation Matching For Precision Enhancementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The retrieval results from syntactic relation matching appears to be no better than the results obtainable using index phrases generated using statistical methods, such as those described by Fagan (1989). Metzler & Haas (1989), Metzler, Haas, Cosic & Weise (1990), Schwarz (1990), and Ruge, Schwarz, & Warner (1991) performed syntactic processing to produce dependency trees that indicate which terms modify which other terms. Smeaton & van Rijsbergen (1988) found that the premodifier-headnoun relation (e.g., adjective-noun) has a bigger impact on retrieval than other relations.…”
Section: Relation Matching For Precision Enhancementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cette intégration se fait souvent par l'ajout de descripteurs syntaxiques dans des langages à base de mots-clefs (Strzalkowski et al, 1998, Zhai et al, 1997, Gaussier et al, 2000. Plus rarement, des modèles plus expressifs utilisent directement les structures syntaxiques (Matsumura et al, 2000, Metzler et al, 1989, Smeaton, 1999, Gao et al, 2004 et effectuent une correspondance sur ces structures.…”
Section: à Travers L'état De L'artunclassified
“…Relation-preserving matching that is crucial for analogical reasoning (Gentner et al 1986) can be achieved easily by ignoring concept labels in the process of forming association graph nodes. Likewise, by ignoring relation labels and considering concept labels and other structural information, the algorithm can perform syntactic structure matching (Metzler and Hass 1989) that takes into account simple labels in concept nodes and their dependencies (i.e. directionality) but ignores the kind of relationships between them.…”
Section: Four Types Of Cg Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%