The constitutive Versus the Declaratory Theory of Recognition: Tertium Non Datur?

Talmon, Stefan

doi:10.1093/bybil/75.1.101

Cited by 18 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…From this point of view, fulfilling the conditions for statehood alone does not suffice to render an entity a subject of international law, thus leaving the non-recognized State without rights and obligations vis-à-vis the non-recognizing States; in other words, international law does not apply between them. 30 The predominant view is the one that considers that state recognition just "establishes, confirms or provides evidence of the objective legal situation". 31 Therefore "the international legal personality of a State and its concomitant rights and obligations solely depend on it being able to satisfy the criteria for statehood".…”

Section: Recognition Of States and The Contravention Of Ius Cogens Rulesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Kosovo’s Constitutionalism and Some Notes on the Legitimacy of the Spanish Position

Gómez¹

2021

AMDI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Este artículo se acerca a la última parte del itinerario seguido por Kosovo en la determinación final de su estatus, que será descrita con base en los documentos y actuaciones de las partes implicadas y en el papel jugado por la comunidad internacional. Estos aspectos son de la mayor relevancia para averiguar si existe la posibilidad de que una Constitución sea la norma suprema de un determinado sistema jurídico, dotando de validez a las normas que lo componen y a la vez se subordine a otro acto jurídico diferente. El artículo analiza el Plan Ahtisaari y la Constitución de Kosovo a la luz del concepto kelseniano de norma fundante básica. Se examinará también, en términos de legitimidad y eficacia, cuáles son las consecuencias de la revitalización de las viejas pulsiones nacionalistas en España, que están afectando directamente al presente de Kosovo.

show abstract

Section: Recognition Of States and The Contravention Of Ius Cogens Rulesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Kosovo’s Constitutionalism and Some Notes on the Legitimacy of the Spanish Position

Gómez¹

2021

AMDI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…76 Statehood does indeed bestow upon states a certain set of 'rudimentary' rights, ie rights the states inherently possess merely by virtue of being states. 77 These include the right of a state to political independence, including the right to choose any political, economic, social, and cultural system, the right to exercise jurisdiction, ie to organise itself as it sees fit, to legislate upon its interests, administer its services, and so forth, as well as certain other rights regarding participation in customary…”

Section: An Essential and Irreducible Freedom From Economic Coercion?mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Right to be Free from Economic Coercion

Tzanakopoulos¹

2015

CJICL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article seeks to determine if there is a fundamental right of states to be free from economic coercion, against the background of international law permitting economic coercion as a means for its own implementation. After defining coercion and other cognate terms, the article surveys the limits to (economic) countermeasures and (economic) sanctions, and determines that any 'sphere of economic freedom' of states is essentially a relative concept, without an irreducible core. Public international law does not currently establish a fundamental right of states to be free from economic coercion-though one should probably be established.

show abstract

“…Gerek izhari gerekse yapıcı kurama dair kapsamlı bilgi için bakınız:Lauterpacht (1944);Talmon (2005).…”

unclassified

The Alternative of Confederalism: A New Constitutional Order for the Resolution of the Georgian- Ossetian Conflict

ERCAN

Kolçak

2022

Uluslararası Hukuk Ve Sosyal Bilim Araştırmaları Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article examines the Georgian-Ossetian conflict by considering recent developments and comes up with a formula for the resolution of the conflict. According to the article, a new confederal order that takes its shape at the constitutional level would contribute to the cessation of the rooted hostilities and the elimination of the institutionalised doubts between the two communities. South Ossetia would benefit from the confederal order in the short run; however, the order would, in the long run, create a public area where the two communities would coexist in a peaceful manner. Collaborationist and integrationist steps taken by the Georgian and Ossetian authorities after the construction of the confederal order would gradually cease the hostilities and eliminate the doubts, ultimately leading to the transformation of regional or national loyalties into confederal allegiances. These allegiances would establish an environment of mutual trust encouraging the communities to turn their confederal union into a federation or unitary state. Such unionist and holistic transformation processes have been completed by historical confederations. Furthermore, present confederal organisations are also carrying out such processes. The article taking into account various matters, e.g. the current Georgian and Ossetian standpoints as well as the present military, financial and political capabilities of the Georgian state, recognises its confederal formula as a worth-examining alternative.

show abstract

The constitutive Versus the Declaratory Theory of Recognition: Tertium Non Datur?

Cited by 18 publications

References 0 publications

Kosovo’s Constitutionalism and Some Notes on the Legitimacy of the Spanish Position

Kosovo’s Constitutionalism and Some Notes on the Legitimacy of the Spanish Position

The Right to be Free from Economic Coercion

The Alternative of Confederalism: A New Constitutional Order for the Resolution of the Georgian- Ossetian Conflict

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About