Differentiating urban places from rural is often obscure. This paper advances some clarification based on the analysis of settlements from the seventh to the eleventh centuries in Israel/ Palestine. In this case study, archaeo logical sites in central Israel are classified into types based on their finds, settlement types are identified through termino logy in texts from or about Palestine, and the results of the two analyses are compared. The main category for distinguishing one settlement type from another is the amount of services it provides, with the greatest range of services in cities. However, cities in this study are not big, not spatially central, and not very industrial; the only entity to answer such criteria is the metropolis. The paper thus highlights the importance of a contextual inquiry, a regional overview, and a bottom-up perspective. KEYWORDS Site typo logy; termino logy; madīna; metropolis; settlement systems; central-place theory; Palestine; Israel; Early Islam Archaeo logists define cities based on their principal layout and physical characteristics or on their assumed function (Smith 2016;. Following these general guidelines, huge ancient sites such as Ur in present-day Iraq are recognized as cities, and sites with a rich variety of artefacts are identified as marketplaces and thus as regional economic centres and cities. The central role assigned to cities does not only relate to trade, but also to political and religious functions reflected in specific architectural forms (Osborne 2015). Archaeo logical sites which yield no such characteristics are often identified as non-cities or 'rural' . However, historians and socio logists agree that the 'city' is a relative concept, changing in