2014
DOI: 10.1017/s174455231400024x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The construction of identity and rights: race and gender in Brazil

Abstract: The recognition of individual identity as multilayered and circumstance based leads to a shift from a theory of general rights to a theory of specific rights connected to structural social change. General rights, such as the right to health and the right to work, must be interpreted according to the circumstance of differently situated women, so that rights are specific enough to ensure that they are actually enforced for different groups, including groups that, due to discrimination, are made invisible to the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bearing in mind that expressions are likely to affect obligations under international law [125], the CRPD's approach to disability marks a landmark change from using "disability" alone to one that joins it with the expression "persons "as per Articles, 2, 3(d) 4 of CRPD (1). That change is of fundamental importance in the present context for the following reasons: firstly, the change signifies that the CRPD's language makes individuals with disabilities constitute a recognisable group of people identifiable from their disabilities while in post conflict context such recognition and identity seem to be over shadowed by more emphasis on the presence of war related disabilities that might be consequential to the collateral damage often associable with armed conflict related wounding [126][127][128][129][130] (paragraphs 23, 58).…”
Section: Definition Of Disabilities and Persons With Disabilities (Crpd)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bearing in mind that expressions are likely to affect obligations under international law [125], the CRPD's approach to disability marks a landmark change from using "disability" alone to one that joins it with the expression "persons "as per Articles, 2, 3(d) 4 of CRPD (1). That change is of fundamental importance in the present context for the following reasons: firstly, the change signifies that the CRPD's language makes individuals with disabilities constitute a recognisable group of people identifiable from their disabilities while in post conflict context such recognition and identity seem to be over shadowed by more emphasis on the presence of war related disabilities that might be consequential to the collateral damage often associable with armed conflict related wounding [126][127][128][129][130] (paragraphs 23, 58).…”
Section: Definition Of Disabilities and Persons With Disabilities (Crpd)mentioning
confidence: 99%