The construction of national identities

Abstract

This paper explores the dynamics of nation-building policies and the conditions under which a state can promote a shared national identity on its territory. A forward-looking central government that internalizes identity dynamics shapes them by choosing the level of state centralization. Homogenization attempts are constrained by political unrest, electoral competition and the intergenerational transmission of identities within the family. We find nation-building efforts are generally characterized by fast interventions. We show that a zero-sum conflict over resources pushes long-run dynamics toward homogeneous steady states and extreme levels of (de)centralization. We also find the ability to foster a common identity is highly dependent on initial conditions, and that country-specific historical factors can have a lasting impact on the long-run distribution of identities.We are grateful to the two anonymous referees for very helpful comments and suggestions. We also want to thank

Authority matters: propaganda and the coevolution of behaviour and attitudes

“…In general, G can change, e.g. if the authority updates its messaging (Almagro and Andrés-Cerezo, 2010 ), or the authority could also produce certain goods (e.g. Verdier and Zenou, 2018 ).…”

“…However some data show that people also react to the rate of change in the frequency of behaviour (Sparkman and Walton, 2019 ). We assume that the authority's messaging is constant, while the authority can change it depending on the situation (Almagro and Andrés-Cerezo 2010 ). On the other hand, the linearity of our model implies that its parameters can be readily estimated using e.g.…”

Advances in the Economic Theory of Cultural Transmission

“…These models can be simulated to feed into cultural transmission processes at the population level; however, they are missing an explicit modeling of the socioeconomic context. Similarly, cultural sociology acknowledges the associative properties of culture, which is viewed as a tool kit of attributes on which people draw to accomplish and legitimize particular strategies of action (Swidler 1986, Alexander 2003, DiMaggio & Markus 2010. Following this perspective, Acemoglu & Robinson (2022) have recently proposed a framework in which culture is represented by a hierarchical structure composed of a cultural set of attributes and cultural configurations reflecting specific associations of attributes within that set.…”

Negotiating national identity in postcolonial Zimbabwe through a national dress

“…Constructing national identity is a strategy that is believed to encourage economic growth, unity, cohesion, patriotism and loyalty to the state (Almagro & Andres-Cerezo, 2020). An absence of national identity is ground for political and economic instability (Almagro & Andres-Cerezo, 2020).…”

“…Constructing national identity is a strategy that is believed to encourage economic growth, unity, cohesion, patriotism and loyalty to the state (Almagro & Andres-Cerezo, 2020). An absence of national identity is ground for political and economic instability (Almagro & Andres-Cerezo, 2020). Countries such as Iraq, Libya, Syria, Sudan, Somalia and Afghanistan have disintegrated into failed states, suffered internal insurgents and chaos due to weak national identities among other factors (Fukuyama, 2018).…”