2011
DOI: 10.1174/021037011797238586
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The constructivist approach

Abstract: In this article we outline the constructivist (or usage-based) approach to children's language development. We argue that linguistic abstractions emerge from the interaction between children's desire to communicate, their intention-reading skills and a distributional analysis of the input. We illustrate our approach by discussing: the development of constituency; inflectional marking; utterance level constructions; more complex syntax in the form of complement-clause structures and relative clauses. We also ad… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the constructivist approach to language emerged to describe the very subtle and complex interactions between lexical items and syntactic structures (Ellis, ). From a different tradition, but largely consistent with this constructivist approach, usage‐based approaches to first language acquisition highlight the multifarious ways in which language is acquired and the close connection between children's actual exposure and their productions (Lieven & Brandt, ; Lieven, Salomo, & Tomasello, ; MacWhinney, ; Tomasello, ; Wonnacott, Boyd, Thomson, & Goldberg, ). Such usage‐based approaches are now also beginning to gain currency in second language acquisition research (Ellis, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Thus, the constructivist approach to language emerged to describe the very subtle and complex interactions between lexical items and syntactic structures (Ellis, ). From a different tradition, but largely consistent with this constructivist approach, usage‐based approaches to first language acquisition highlight the multifarious ways in which language is acquired and the close connection between children's actual exposure and their productions (Lieven & Brandt, ; Lieven, Salomo, & Tomasello, ; MacWhinney, ; Tomasello, ; Wonnacott, Boyd, Thomson, & Goldberg, ). Such usage‐based approaches are now also beginning to gain currency in second language acquisition research (Ellis, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In first language acquisition, cognitive and usage-based models show that acquisition starts with 'lexically specific phrases and [children then] gradually build up a repertoire of increasingly abstract constructions' (Dąbrowska and Lieven, 2005 : 437;cf. also Dąbrowska, 2014 ;Lieven and Brandt, 2011 ;Tomasello, 2005 ). FSs are therefore, in an individual sense, where it all starts for language.…”
Section: Formulaic Sequencesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Thus, the constructivist approach to language emerged to describe the very subtle and complex interactions between lexical items and syntactic structures (Ellis, 2013). From a different tradition, but largely consistent with this constructivist approach, usage-based approaches to first language acquisition highlight the multifarious ways in which language is acquired and the close connection between children's actual exposure and their productions (Lieven & Brandt, 2011;Lieven, Salomo, & Tomasello, 2009;MacWhinney, 2005;Tomasello, 2003;Wonnacott, Boyd, Thomson, & Goldberg, 2012). Such usage-based approaches are now also beginning to gain currency in second language acquisition research (Ellis, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%