The consultation of rugby players in co-developing a player health study: feasibility and consequences of sports participants as research partners

Abstract

Plain English summary Many funding bodies within the United Kingdom and globally have encouraged public involvement in research. The Department of Health has also called public involvement a sign of good research. Despite the wide acceptance of public involvement improving many aspects of research, from its design to its communication, involvement has varied levels of implementation across different fields of research. Sports people have rarely been involved in research, partly as this research tends not to be funded by mainstream funding bodies. This may lead to a lower research quality, not founded in player (‘service user’) experiences.When creating a study of former rugby player health, we were very keen to involve rugby players, understand their thoughts on player health, and their playing experiences. This article explains how rugby players were involved in several ways, but mainly in group discussions during the design stage. These groups helped to inform our study’s aims and questionnaire, ensure the questionnaire would capture player experiences and answer questions relevant to players, that they would like to understand after their participation in rugby.We found that these groups were easy to arrange, and that in only one session with each group, we were given many ideas of how to improve the questionnaire and study. We believe that other studies in sports should involve sports people, and that this is a useful activity that will change data collection forms and processes, improving the research, helping researchers, and making studies more suitable for players who take part in them.Abstract Background Patient and public involvement (‘involvement’) in the UK has increased in accordance with funding requirements, patient-centered health policy initiatives and reporting of the positive impact of involvement for those involved, research and researchers. However, involvement has not been implemented equally across all disease areas and populations. The aim of this process was to involve rugby players across the research cycle of a player health study, ensure the study is player-centred, and that players had approved and informed the design of the study and its questionnaire from their playing experiences. Methods Two group discussions were undertaken with current students who were playing rugby at a Collegiate University. All male and female University rugby players and two College rugby teams were approached to become involved. Sessions were chaired by a player-lead using a topic guide and were audio-recorded and transcribed. Player suggestions were extracted by the player-lead and discussed within the study team for inclusion in the player health study and its questionnaire. Results Players readily engaged with the sessions and made many contributions to the development of the study and the questionnaire. Players discussed whether certain topics were being collected satisfactorily, and whether the questionnaire would encompass their playing experiences or that of other players. Players suggested where an...

Common Issues and Differences in Motivational Support and the Effects of Rugby for the U-15 and U-16 National Teams

“…The effectiveness of consulting rugby players (as research partners in the university environment/colleagues) was demonstrated in a previous study [54]. They made an important contribution to the construction of a questionnaire aimed at assessing their health, noting superior involvement, additions and improvements for standardized items or those with free answers, and suggestions about their own experiences, similar issues also encountered in our study.…”

Osteoarthritis and other long-term health conditions in former elite cricketers

“…Six PPI sessions were held, resulting in consensus on the cricket-specific variables and wellbeing measures and the phrasing for capturing these variables, as described in other PPI practice. 17 Three wellbeing measures stated, “Considering the benefits and risks of my previous participation in cricket, I would do the same again,” “Considering the benefits and risks of my previous participation in cricket, I would recommend this to my children, relatives, or close friends,” and “Did your cricket career enrich your life?” The responses of each wellbeing measure were categorised into “agree”, “undecided”, and “disagree” responses.…”

Health amongst former rugby union players: A cross-sectional study of morbidity and health-related quality of life

“…Patient and public involvement was undertaken throughout the research cycle of this study, with rugby players assisting as consultants co-developing and managing this study 20 . Current and former players were extensively involved throughout the research cycle, with study and questionnaire design, study oversight, and questionnaire testing.…”

“…This process aimed to ensure the questionnaire was accessible and intuitive for players, and that it was revised and tested with the target population. Two player involvement fora were undertaken with eleven players informing the recruitment strategy, research agenda and functionality of online data collection, the process and output of which have been reported elsewhere 20 .…”