2017
DOI: 10.4135/9781071802878
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Content Analysis Guidebook

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

34
2,777
1
371

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3,665 publications
(3,183 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
34
2,777
1
371
Order By: Relevance
“…We chose the 2012-2013 period to neutralize the potential confounding effect of the reforms in environmental laws that occurred in subsequent years (i.e., introduction of a tax on waste disposal by the law 147/2013 and the revision of the Robin Hood tax by the D.L. n. 69/2013).3 Content analysis allowed us to codify written text into groups and categories based on selected criteria and to draw logical inferences by analyzing large numbers of reports in terms of their disclosures and omissions(Krippendorff, 2004;Neuendorf, 2002).4 As a robustness check, we performed an alpha test fromKrippendorff (1980) to ensure homogeneity of the content analysis process. Specifically, two coders (one author and one research assistant) rated to the same set of environmental information provided by a sub-sample of 60 companies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We chose the 2012-2013 period to neutralize the potential confounding effect of the reforms in environmental laws that occurred in subsequent years (i.e., introduction of a tax on waste disposal by the law 147/2013 and the revision of the Robin Hood tax by the D.L. n. 69/2013).3 Content analysis allowed us to codify written text into groups and categories based on selected criteria and to draw logical inferences by analyzing large numbers of reports in terms of their disclosures and omissions(Krippendorff, 2004;Neuendorf, 2002).4 As a robustness check, we performed an alpha test fromKrippendorff (1980) to ensure homogeneity of the content analysis process. Specifically, two coders (one author and one research assistant) rated to the same set of environmental information provided by a sub-sample of 60 companies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By this process, we ensured that the assignment of examples to categories was such that categories were non-redundant, readable, general and discriminant (O'Reilly, Chatman and Caldwell, 1991). In line with best practice (Saunders and Townsend, 2016), this analysis provided evidence for data saturation and hence the adequacy of the sample size in the form of repetition in coding examples to existing categories and the absence of new categories being created (Neuendorf, 2002). As a final step, we used a qualitative clustering approach (Miles and Huberman, 1994) to undertake an in-depth examination of the data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Two coders coded all the data after test-coding a sample of transcripts and achieving Kappa scores exceeding the common >0.80 benchmark for near perfect inter-coder reliability. 27 SMD and GA performed analytical queries to identify key themes in the coded data, using the constant comparative and concept-development approach. 28…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%