The contesting aspirations in the forests

Maryudi, Ahmad

doi:10.17875/gup2011-282

Cited by 32 publications

(23 citation statements)

References 131 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Nilsen et al 44 used the first compound as an indicator chemical to identify PS. Authors such as Hadimi et al 45 and Mayurdi et al 46 obtained very similar results in their chromatograms.…”

Section: Oil Characterization Using Ftirsupporting

confidence: 55%

Production of an Alternative Fuel by Pyrolysis of Plastic Wastes Mixtures

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper tries to obtain an alternative liquid fuel from plastic waste from the fraction not collected selectively, through a pyrolysis process. The fuels obtained from three plastic wastes, polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), and polystyrene (PS), and from binary mixtures (PE−PP and PE−PS) and a tertiary mixture (PE−PP−PS) were characterized. These plastic wastes are the most abundant in the fraction not collected selectively. Concretely, the polyethylene film comprises 43% of total plastic of this fraction. The plastic mixtures have been chosen according to the composition of the plastic in this fraction. Liquid fuel from the polyethylene film had very similar characteristics to commercial fuels, in particular, diesel, but had a very high viscosity and a waxy appearance. Liquid fuel from polystyrene had a very fluid appearance, but possessed a large number of aromatic compounds, being useful for the synthesis of basic chemical products. The liquid obtained from polypropylene has a semiwaxy appearance and a large number of olefins. Finally, the mixtures of these wastes produced intermediate characteristics. The viscosity and waxy aspect increases when the quantity of polyethylene increases, while fluidity and the quantity of aromatic compounds also increase when the quantity of polystyrene increases.

show abstract

“…Nilsen et al 44 used the first compound as an indicator chemical to identify PS. Authors such as Hadimi et al 45 and Mayurdi et al 46 obtained very similar results in their chromatograms.…”

Section: Oil Characterization Using Ftirsupporting

confidence: 55%

Production of an Alternative Fuel by Pyrolysis of Plastic Wastes Mixtures

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Since no evidence for biodiversity was found to support the first possibility (see Table 1), this study concludes with the second assumption. The results of this research are not surprising and were observed in a variety of similar studies elsewhere (Brendler & Carey, 1998;Chakraborty, 2001;Dietz et al, 2003;Thomas, 2006;Charnley & Poe, 2007;Adhikari et al, 2007;Singh, 2008;Wollenberg et al, 2008;Devkota, 2010;Vodouhe et al, 2010;Maryudi, 2011;Pandit et al, 2011).…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 84%

“…Ribot and Agrawal (2006) report similar findings in their article "Recentralizing While Decentralizing: How National Governments Reappropriate Forest Resources". Apart from this, results in general support the general scientific notion that actors other than the local natural resource user are the ones who decide how CF is to work in practice (Maryudi, 2011;Devkota, 2010;Shackleton et al, 2002;Wollenberg et al, 2008;Ribot, 2004;Ribot, 2009;Larson, 2005;Blaikie, 2006;Dahal & Capistrano, 2006;Edmunds & Wollenberg, 2001;Agraval & Gibson, 1999).…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 53%

“…Many researchers concluded that this would require power devolution to the local users, even at the community level (Ostrom, 1999;Acharya, 2002;Lachapelle et al, 2004;Nygren, 2005). Experience gathered around the world has shown that CF programs contribute at least to improved forest ecology (Brendler & Carey, 1998;Chakraborty, 2001;Dietz et al, 2003;Tomas, 2006;Charnley & Poe, 2007;Adhikari et al, 2007;Singh, 2008;Wollenberg et al, 2008;Devkota, 2010;Vodouhe et al, 2010;Maryudi, 2011;Pandit et al, 2011). However, other objectives, related to direct forest users, have more questionable outcomes.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, other objectives, related to direct forest users, have more questionable outcomes. Maryudi (2011) and Devkota (2010) analysed community forests and concluded that local forest users were not the decision makers and that their livelihoods improved only slightly. According to Edmunds and Wollenberg (2001, p. 192), it is likely that the poorest forest user is now worse off than before.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Community Forestry in Germany, a Case Study Seen Through the Lens of the International Model

Schusser¹,

Krott²,

Logmani³

et al. 2013

JSD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Recent and on-going international research, especially on community forestry in developing countries, has begun to question the success of the international community forestry concept that was introduced more recently, by the end of the 1970s. Though it appears that community forestry does contribute to a positive ecological outcome, further analysis seems to reveal that other advantages promised by the model, i.e., devolution of power to the local resource users and improvement of their livelihoods, simply do not happen.In comparison the German Community Forestry as a concept was first introduced during the 18th century. This article investigates the ways in which German community forestry works and, given that it's continued existence represents a measure of success, whether it can be a model for community forestry worldwide. To ascertain this, we analyse 11 community forests in Germany, applying power theory and methodology to identify the powerful actors and these actors' interests. In addition, we also analyse the outcomes of community forestry.The results show that the researched community forests are sustainably managed, but that powerful actors control this management. The direct forest user is not very involved and benefits only slightly. Therefore, the article concludes that the German community forestry cannot be a worldwide model, but that it is nevertheless an interesting model in practice if the goal is to manage forest resources sustainably.

show abstract

Community Forestry

Schusser¹

2015

Tropical Forestry Handbook

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The contesting aspirations in the forests

Cited by 32 publications

References 131 publications

Production of an Alternative Fuel by Pyrolysis of Plastic Wastes Mixtures

Production of an Alternative Fuel by Pyrolysis of Plastic Wastes Mixtures

Community Forestry in Germany, a Case Study Seen Through the Lens of the International Model

Community Forestry

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About