2001
DOI: 10.4135/9781452229249
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Contingency Theory of Organizations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

50
1,740
2
185

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,930 publications
(1,977 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
50
1,740
2
185
Order By: Relevance
“…(2) Effectiveness measures the degree to which organizational goals are reached and is achieved by fitting characteristics of the organization to its context (Lawrence and Lorsch 1967;Child 1975;Donaldson 2001: 1) (3) Adaptiveness refers to the ability of an organization to react to changes in its environment. For the sake of brevity, we exclude measures a company may take to influence the environment from the analysis, although it is clear that the 'strategic choice' typically includes more than the definition of structural forms (Child 1972).…”
Section: Analytical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) Effectiveness measures the degree to which organizational goals are reached and is achieved by fitting characteristics of the organization to its context (Lawrence and Lorsch 1967;Child 1975;Donaldson 2001: 1) (3) Adaptiveness refers to the ability of an organization to react to changes in its environment. For the sake of brevity, we exclude measures a company may take to influence the environment from the analysis, although it is clear that the 'strategic choice' typically includes more than the definition of structural forms (Child 1972).…”
Section: Analytical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our interest in drawing on research in human organizations is twofold: first we look to draw on general organizational principles that may apply to artificial as well as human organizations; second, we are ultimately interested in being able to build hybrid humanagent networks, and so staying within the bounds of organizational properties that have some analogue in human behavior seems desirable. In human settings, organizational performance has been demonstrated empirically to be associated with the degree of congruence (or 'fit') between organizational structure and properties of the task or environment [9]. Accordingly, it is to an organizations advantage to monitor the fit between its structure and mission, and to alter its structure when a misfit is identified.…”
Section: Towards a Useful Simulation For Reorganizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A logical starting-point is contingency theory, which primarily deals with external factors ('contingencies') that moderate the effect of specific organizational characteristics on organizational effectiveness (Donaldson, 2001). Uncertainty is regarded as one of the most important contingencies organizations are faced with.…”
Section: Co-production: An Alternative Logicmentioning
confidence: 99%