2021
DOI: 10.1111/meta.12513
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The continuity of inquiry and normative philosophy of science

Abstract: The history of philosophy is intertwined with that of the natural sciences, and philosophical reflection on elements of scientific inquiry has gained a prominent place in the philosophical landscape. The enormous progress in science has brought along distinctive challenges that make it a particularly appropriate site for philosophical inquiry, and most key scientific fields are today accompanied by subdisciplines of philosophy that examine the nature, aims, and methodology of the subject matter of that field. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But this need not worry those philosophers who are committed to the idea of a genuine encounter of philosophy and various empirical research endeavours, because practice-guided public health philosophy need not be conducted by philosophers. Philosophical inquiry deploys tools that it shares with empirical scientists, such as rigorous argumentation, logical reasoning and the replacement of folk concepts with concepts that better suit their theoretical purpose, although philosophers tend to operate them with a special expertise and meticulousness (Laplane et al, 2019, Varga, 2021. Based on our experience from public health research, philosophers appear especially well-equipped to assist public health research in a way that empirical researchers often cannot afford in their daily activities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But this need not worry those philosophers who are committed to the idea of a genuine encounter of philosophy and various empirical research endeavours, because practice-guided public health philosophy need not be conducted by philosophers. Philosophical inquiry deploys tools that it shares with empirical scientists, such as rigorous argumentation, logical reasoning and the replacement of folk concepts with concepts that better suit their theoretical purpose, although philosophers tend to operate them with a special expertise and meticulousness (Laplane et al, 2019, Varga, 2021. Based on our experience from public health research, philosophers appear especially well-equipped to assist public health research in a way that empirical researchers often cannot afford in their daily activities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%