The contour effect: Differences in the aesthetic preference and stress response to photo-realistic living environments

Abstract

The interest in the response to contours has recently re-emerged, with various studies suggesting a universal preference for curved over angular stimuli. Although no consensus has yet been reached on the reasons for this preference, similar effects have been proposed in interior environments. However, the scarcely available research primarily depends on schematic or unmatched stimuli and faces heterogeneity in the reported results. In a within-subject design, we investigated the claimed contour effect in photo-realistic indoor environments using stimulus material previously tested in virtual reality (VR). A total of 198 online participants rated 20 living room images, exclusively manipulated on the contours (angular vs. curved) and style (modern vs. classic) levels. The scales represented aesthetic (beauty and liking) and stress (rest and stress) responses. Beyond our main focus on contours, we additionally examined style and sex effects to account for potential interactions. Results revealed a significant main effect of contours on both aesthetic (η2g = 1–2%) and stress (η2g = 8–12%) ratings. As expected, images of curved (vs. angular) contours scored higher on beauty, liking, and rest scales, and lower on stress. Regarding interactions with style, curvature was aesthetically preferred over angularity only within images depicting modern interiors, however, its positive effect on stress responses remained significant irrespective of style. Furthermore, we observed sex differences in aesthetic but not in stress evaluations, with curvature preference only found in participants who indicated female as their sex. In sum, our study primarily confirms positive effects of curvature, however, with multiple layers. First, the impact on aesthetic preference seems to be influenced by individual and contextual factors. Second, in terms of stress responses, which might be especially relevant for designs intended to promote mental-health, the consistent effects suggest a more generalizable, potentially biophilic characteristic of curves. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate these effects in fully-matched, photo-realistic, and multi-perspective interior design stimuli. From the background of a previous VR trial from our research group, whereby the same rooms did not elicit any differences, our findings propose that static vs. immersive presentations might yield different results in the response to contours.

Promoting Geosites on Web-Pages: An Assessment of the Quality and Quantity of Information in Real Cases

“…On the one hand, these differ too much depending on the skills of the web-page creators. On the other hand, judgments of these aspects depend on aesthetic preferences and digital skills of tourists, which may differ substantially, reflecting personal attitudes and experience [67][68][69][70][71]. Information from geosite-focused web-pages can be analyzed in regard to their quality and quantity.…”

The Aesthetic Developmental Characteristics of Contour Features in Children and Adolescents with High- and Low- Level Visual Aesthetic Sensitivity across Grade Levels

“…Sci. 2024, 14, 416 2 of 11 meaningful patterns [9,11,[19][20][21], typefaces [22,23], paintings [24], car interior designs [25], product designs [26], furniture [27], and architectural and interior environments [18,[28][29][30]. The aesthetic preference for curved contours has also been confirmed in different cultures [1,2,21,31] and species [9].…”