1982
DOI: 10.1007/bfb0069942
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The contraction number of a class of two-level methods; an exact evaluation for some finite element subspaces and model problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
61
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…constants γ for linear finite elements are presented e.g. in [2], [5]. For two levels of hierarchy, the constant γ is 1 2 in the case of the isotropic Laplacian and rectangular finite elements, …”
Section: Comparison To Linear Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…constants γ for linear finite elements are presented e.g. in [2], [5]. For two levels of hierarchy, the constant γ is 1 2 in the case of the isotropic Laplacian and rectangular finite elements, …”
Section: Comparison To Linear Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We see from this definition that this new preconditioner generalizes the method from Vassilevski [15] (v -X,pv = X -t) and that from Axelsson and Vassilevski [3] (ko = X), and can be considered as an alternative algebraic generalization of the classical two-level methods studied in Bank and Dupont [5], Braess [7,8], Axelsson [1], Axelsson and Gustafsson [2], and Maitre and Musy [13]. A special variant of the present method for ko = 2 was considered in Vassilevski [16], which generalizes an earlier result of Kuznetsov [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…At any rate, one cannot disentangle this dependence upon u from ∇ε in (5.23). Maitre and Musy [25] have estimated β 2 solely in terms of the triangulation. In fact, they show that…”
Section: Theorem 59 For V ∈ Hmentioning
confidence: 99%