2018
DOI: 10.1002/jcad.12204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Contribution of Attachment and Social Media Practices to Relationship Development

Abstract: This study tested the hypothesized directional relationship that college students (N = 717; 10.1% response rate to an online survey) who score higher on measures of insecure attachment and social media practices would have lower relationship development quality scores. Structural equation modeling results indicated that participants with greater insecure attachment had lower relationship development quality (large effect size), whereas individuals with greater social media practices had higher relationship dev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although we cannot infer from the current study if problematic SNS use is on the whole a cause of problematic wellbeing and mental health, the findings are useful to predict individuals who could be most at risk. The current findings can be generalised to convey that attachment style serves social skills similarly online as it does offline and that individuals with certain social orientations will be more drawn to using social media than others and for different intentions (Sherrell and Lambie, 2018). Current findings are useful to identify that avoidantly-attached individuals are likely to turn to social media to alleviate unwanted distress; however, they seem unlikely to benefit from doing so and, as highlighted in the current study, can suffer from decreasing levels of wellbeing as a result.…”
Section: Theoretical and Practical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Although we cannot infer from the current study if problematic SNS use is on the whole a cause of problematic wellbeing and mental health, the findings are useful to predict individuals who could be most at risk. The current findings can be generalised to convey that attachment style serves social skills similarly online as it does offline and that individuals with certain social orientations will be more drawn to using social media than others and for different intentions (Sherrell and Lambie, 2018). Current findings are useful to identify that avoidantly-attached individuals are likely to turn to social media to alleviate unwanted distress; however, they seem unlikely to benefit from doing so and, as highlighted in the current study, can suffer from decreasing levels of wellbeing as a result.…”
Section: Theoretical and Practical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…SEM is a confirmatory procedure that is a combination of multiple regression, path analysis, and confirmatory factor analysis (Schumacker & Lomax, 2016;Ullman, 2007), and it can be used in experimental and nonexperimental designs but is most often used in correlational studies (Ullman, 2007). For example, Sherrell and Lambie (2018) applied SEM to examine the contribution of college students' attachment styles and social media practices to their relationship development. Unlike multiple regression, SEM allows an investigator to test proposed theoretical models that are supported by the literature and provides directionality of relationships for more complex models involving multiple independent and dependent variables in a causal framework (Graziano & Raulin, 2013;Ullman, 2007).…”
Section: Semmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Facebook Intensity scale (FBI; Ellison et al, 2007) was used to measure social media intensity after participants indicated whether they had a Facebook account (see Table 1). The FBI has been used in a wide variety of contexts, such as studies on exercise motivation (Devine, Watson, Baker, & Hall, 2019), relational development (Sherrell & Lambie, 2018), and life satisfaction (Zhan, Sun, Wang, & Zhang, 2016). The scale includes six centrality items that are measured on 7-point Likert-type scale with anchors ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (7).…”
Section: Social Media Intensity: Facebook and Twittermentioning
confidence: 99%