2013
DOI: 10.1505/146554813805927237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The contribution of bamboo to household income and rural livelihoods in a poor and mountainous county in Guangxi, China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
43
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unequal access to capacity development and marketing training among the study districts may also have contributed to the differential levels of commercialization. This hypothesis was in agreement with a previous study by teVelde [18] comparing different NTFP commercialization in Mexico and Bolivia and another study comparing bamboo-growing villages in a remote region of China [25].…”
Section: Determinants Of Commercializationsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unequal access to capacity development and marketing training among the study districts may also have contributed to the differential levels of commercialization. This hypothesis was in agreement with a previous study by teVelde [18] comparing different NTFP commercialization in Mexico and Bolivia and another study comparing bamboo-growing villages in a remote region of China [25].…”
Section: Determinants Of Commercializationsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Several studies in Asia reveal that bamboo supports rural development, appeals to smallholder producers, and has several pro-poor characteristics [22][23][24][25][26]. Moreover, bamboo has become a high-tech industrial raw material and substitute for wood with well-established markets and a wide range of production-to-consumption systems [27,28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of utilisation of forest resources, poorer households, characterised by limited livelihood options, are more dependent on forest products than wealthier households but this is a function of specific products required (Cavendish 2003;Shackleton and Shackleton 2006;Shackleton et al 2007;Jagger 2012;Hogarth and Belcher 2013;Vedeld and Sjaastad 2013). These differences in the utilisation are also reflected in the level of income generated from forests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly to rice husk, bamboo area covers over 6.3 million km 2 in Asian countries [10]. It is known as an easy-growing plant and more than ten million farmers are involved with bamboo production, adding up to 35 million jobs [11] [12]. The rapid growth of bamboo forest tends to overpower other plant species and become a monoculture forest, contributing to the loss of biodiversity, soil nutrition, and damaging soil's physical structure [11] [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%