“…Modern SE adhesives were documented to benefit also from additional chemical interaction of the functional monomer with hydroxyapatite. Despite the proven chemical interaction potential of the functional monomer MDP with HAp (Yoshida et al, 2004;Yoshihara et al, 2010Yoshihara et al, , 2011Yoshihara et al, , 2013Zhang et al, 2013), the SE bonding protocol appeared insufficient to reach a mini-iFT at enamel in line with that achieved with an E&R bonding protocol. The three most plausible reasons are: (1) the enamel bond depends largely on micro-mechanical interlocking in deep etch pits created by phosphoric-acid etching, while the etching capacity of functional monomers like MDP is insufficient to achieve adequate micro-retention at enamel; (2) MDP appears less capable of reaching/interacting with Ca within enamel HAp that has a higher crystallinity and is less crisscross oriented than dentinal HAp; at enamel, despite its higher mineral content, less MDP-Ca salt is produced than at dentin Yokota and Nishiyama, 2015); (3) the mild self-etch bonding is compromised by the enamel-smear complex, the latter being effectively removed by phosphoricacid etching and thus not interfering with bonding in case the more surface-aggressive E&R approach is applied .…”