2018
DOI: 10.1080/00219266.2018.1469540
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The contribution of dichotomous keys to the quality of biological-botanical knowledge of eighth grade students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Stagg, Donkin, and Smith (2015) have found that a mobile device key for identifying tree species represents an effective tool. Anđić et al (2018) have demonstrated that digital dichotomous keys contribute to higher quality of acquired knowledge in comparison with printed dichotomous keys. Further, on the basis of questionnaires for students, Silva et al (2011) have noticed that an interactive identification key is a good and friendly mean for learning botany, besides is much more accessible both for pupils and students.…”
Section: Mobile Technology Supporting Outdoor Lessonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stagg, Donkin, and Smith (2015) have found that a mobile device key for identifying tree species represents an effective tool. Anđić et al (2018) have demonstrated that digital dichotomous keys contribute to higher quality of acquired knowledge in comparison with printed dichotomous keys. Further, on the basis of questionnaires for students, Silva et al (2011) have noticed that an interactive identification key is a good and friendly mean for learning botany, besides is much more accessible both for pupils and students.…”
Section: Mobile Technology Supporting Outdoor Lessonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A review of the previous research indicated that the contribution of dichotomous keys (DK) for plant identification to knowledge on biodiversity has been tested only on students without any visual impairment. Recent studies (Anđić, Cvijetićanin, Maričić, & Stešević, 2018;Knight & Davies, 2014) have confirmed the positive contribution of DK to knowledge on biodiversity. Some researchers have suggested that NV students can achieve the same quality of knowledge in different natural sciences, as students who have no visual impairment (Freire et al, 2010;Rice et al, 2012), which forms the basic idea of this research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…This is in correlation with the research by Cassia et al (2009), in which it was concluded that the use of assistive technology and educational software contributed more to the quality of the knowledge of NV students and students in comparison to the traditional way of learning, in which the verbal-textual method dominates. Moving from one claim to another in the DDK was facilitated by a simple click that influenced concentration (Anđić et al, 2018) and allowed the NV in Group E 1 to focus on the tactile, auditory and smell senses while exploring the plant more than the NV in Group E 2 (Röder et al, 1999). These assumptions are in correlation with many studies in the field of neuroscience which have shown that NV encode auditory verbal material better than those without visual impairment, causing greater brain activity and better memory performance (Röder, Rösler, & Neville, 2001;Kujala, Alho, Paavialinen, Summala, & Näätänen, 1992).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The findings of a number of studies (e.g. Anđić et al, 2018Anđić et al, , 2020Silva et al, 2011) indicate that digital interactive dichotomous keys are better learning tools than printed non-interactive dichotomous keys. Silva et al (2011) reported that high school students achieved better knowledge about the identification of plant species when using DIKs on tablets and computers.…”
Section: The Dik As a Learning Toolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There exist a great number of published papers (e.g. Anđić et al, 2018;Drinkwater, 2009;Farr, 2006;Silva et al, 2011;Stagg & Donkin, 2016) that have offered arguments for the application of digital identification keys (afterward DIK) as one of the solutions which can help in decreasing plant blindness and increasing students' knowledge about plants and/or their motivation to learn about flora.…”
Section: Introduction and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%