2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.10.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The contribution of different prefrontal cortex regions to recollection and familiarity: a review of fMRI data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
26
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 112 publications
3
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Strongly associated pairs elicited greater recollection-based responding than weakly associated pairs and greater fMRI activation during retrieval in HC and VLPFC, while weakly associated pairs elicited greater activation in DLPFC, which the authors attributed to increased familiaritybased responding. However, contradictory findings have been reported relating increased VLPFC activation, rather than DLPFC, to increases in familiarity-based responding (Scalici et al, 2017;Henson et al, 1999). It is therefore somewhat unclear whether activation in DLPFC or VLPFC will activation will be more correlated with correct rejections of visually integrated pairs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Strongly associated pairs elicited greater recollection-based responding than weakly associated pairs and greater fMRI activation during retrieval in HC and VLPFC, while weakly associated pairs elicited greater activation in DLPFC, which the authors attributed to increased familiaritybased responding. However, contradictory findings have been reported relating increased VLPFC activation, rather than DLPFC, to increases in familiarity-based responding (Scalici et al, 2017;Henson et al, 1999). It is therefore somewhat unclear whether activation in DLPFC or VLPFC will activation will be more correlated with correct rejections of visually integrated pairs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, we predicted that we may observe an overall reduction in DLPFC activation for visually integrated compared to nonintegrated pairs. Activation in DLPFC and VLPFC has also been differentiated based on the dual-process model, albeit with mixed results (Bunge, Burrows, & Wagner, 2004, Scalici et al, 2017Henson et al, 1999). For example, Bunge et al (2004) compared recognition of strongly and weakly associated pairs of novel visual patterns.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the ultrahigh magnetic field is harmful to aims to localize brain areas linked to basic functions, such as vision [19], auditory [20,21], language [22,23], moving [24], cognition [25][26][27], etc. The other one is the neurophysiological mechanism of severe brain diseases.…”
Section: Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Familiarity memory is a type of recognition memory that is derived from the comparison between incoming information and previously stored representations, but it remains to be established how the brain generates familiarity signals as a function of stored representations and whether these signals are integrated across different brain regions. Indeed, across many functional neuroimaging studies (e.g., Montaldi et al 2006;Skinner and Fernandes 2007;Montaldi 2012, 2014;Scalici et al 2017), familiarity memory has been shown to engage a number of brain regions, which suggests that several interacting processes support familiarity memory and that these processes engage functionally connected brain regions. An important endeavor, therefore, is to characterize the role of the dynamic interactions of networks involved in memory and the integration of familiarity signals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%