1981
DOI: 10.1016/0095-0696(81)90048-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The contribution of environmental regulations to the slowdown in productivity growth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
96
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 175 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
96
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the earliest studies of environmental regulation, that almost exclusively analyse the productivity slowdown in the United States during the 1970s, a negative effect on productivity is found [1,2,6,11,19,21,36]. A negative effect is also found in some of the more contemporary studies [8,16,22,23,37,38].…”
Section: Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the earliest studies of environmental regulation, that almost exclusively analyse the productivity slowdown in the United States during the 1970s, a negative effect on productivity is found [1,2,6,11,19,21,36]. A negative effect is also found in some of the more contemporary studies [8,16,22,23,37,38].…”
Section: Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…But since the second half of the 1960s, an increasing concern has emerged regarding environmental pollution and, consequently, a large number of regulations restricting the emissions have been imposed. However, during the 1970s, the ascending regulatory stringency coincided with a number of recessions, stagflation, and a general slowdown in the rate of productivity increase, which inevitably led to a heated debate on whether these regulatory schemes were the actual cause behind this problematic economic development [1,2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adjustments are based on finding producers' shadow values for all inputs and outputs to substitute for market prices in profits (or costs). Distortions considered have been those from imperfect competition (see for example the studies in Cowing and Stevenson, 1981, and more recently Basu and Fernald 2001), from underutilization of capacity (see Berndt and Fuss, 1986, and other papers in that special issue of the Journal of Econometrics), from economies of scale (Ohta 1975), from pollution abatement regulations (Denison 1979;Norsworthy, et al, 1979;Crandall 1981;Christiansen and Haveman, 1981;Pittman, 1983;Färe, et al, 1989;Conrad and Morrison, 1989), or from the existence of a common-property renewable resource (Capalbo, 1986). These producer-oriented studies focus on measuring technical change as a shift in the technology set.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite these developments favoring environmental management, some researchers argued that environmental efforts may increase the cost burden, reduce the competitiveness of companies, and result in a decrease in productivity growth (Christainsen 1981;Walley and Whitehead 1994;Palmer et al 1995). However, today's market conditions bring GMA's basic principles as an important part of profit maximization and competitive advantage (Porter 1991;Porter and Van der Linde 1995a, b).…”
Section: The Changing Platform Of Thoughtmentioning
confidence: 99%