2016
DOI: 10.1039/c5nj01457c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The contribution of polar C–H hydrogen bonds to anion binding

Abstract: Binding abilities depend on the magnitude of C–H polarization.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The unsubstituted receptor 19c showed no affinity toward a range of anions, while the slightly-more polarized receptor 19b only bound H 2 PO 4 − . 48 Receptor 19a, however, which featured the most polarized aryl CH hydrogen bond, was able to bind all four anions studied (H 2 PO 4 − , HSO 4 − , Cl − , and Br − ). In this case, the extent of polarization of this aryl CH HB, along with the favorable electrostatic interactions and possible N-methyl pyridinium CH HBs in 19a, were critical in creating a favorable host-guest interaction in solution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The unsubstituted receptor 19c showed no affinity toward a range of anions, while the slightly-more polarized receptor 19b only bound H 2 PO 4 − . 48 Receptor 19a, however, which featured the most polarized aryl CH hydrogen bond, was able to bind all four anions studied (H 2 PO 4 − , HSO 4 − , Cl − , and Br − ). In this case, the extent of polarization of this aryl CH HB, along with the favorable electrostatic interactions and possible N-methyl pyridinium CH HBs in 19a, were critical in creating a favorable host-guest interaction in solution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The Kang group also reported on the effect of polarization of aryl CH hydrogen bonds on anion binding. 48 Their receptors utilized an amide NH HB, a central anthracene CH HB, and an aryl CH polarized by an ortho pyridinium, a para-nitro group, or a control receptor without substituents (Fig. 12b, 19a-c, respectively).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared to the more traditional N–H and O–H donors, the hydrogen bonding donor abilities of C–H bonds are relatively weaker . Although alkyl and aryl C–H bonds are present in the overwhelming majority (97%) of organic compounds, receptors utilizing C–H hydrogen bonds are rare. Neutral C–H and cationic C–H donors, such as alkyl C–H donors, phenyl C–H donors, triazole-based C–H donors, and imidazolium and triazolium C–H donors, have been applied in binding anions. Among the C–H donors, receptors containing alkyl C–H donors are very rare . Recently, Hay and Pedzisa used electronic structure calculations to determine C–H···Cl – hydrogen-bonding energies for a series of XCH 3 donor groups .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%