2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10198-019-01123-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The contribution of real-world evidence to cost-effectiveness analysis: case study of Dabigatran etexilate in France

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The costs and impact on HRQOL of a disabling stroke were similar to those reported in other France-based analyses. 28,29 The disutility inputs were derived largely from the costeffectiveness study performed by Lanitis et al 24 ; this study based its data on an EQ-5D study conducted in a UK population. 30 Consideration should be given to how well these data truly generalize to a French population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The costs and impact on HRQOL of a disabling stroke were similar to those reported in other France-based analyses. 28,29 The disutility inputs were derived largely from the costeffectiveness study performed by Lanitis et al 24 ; this study based its data on an EQ-5D study conducted in a UK population. 30 Consideration should be given to how well these data truly generalize to a French population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the perspective of scientific research, existing recommendations for analytic procedures in realworld-study-based CEAs remain insufficient [7,8,51]. Our analytic procedures for conducting a real-worldstudy-based CEA, which carefully consider study cohort comparability, the validity of effectiveness and cost parameter estimations, and the uncertainty of study data, results, and assumptions, provide a methodological framework for future real-world-study-based CEAs.…”
Section: Methodological Strengths Of Present Study For Supporting Analytic Framework Of Future Real-world Ceasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CEA results can support treatment prioritization, facilitate healthcare reimbursement policy formulation, and optimize healthcare resource allocation. The incorporation of real-world effectiveness and cost data into CEA complements the evidence derived from clinical trials and ensures that the results will be relevant for the real-life healthcare decision-making context [7,8]. However, most CEAs of GLP-1RA versus insulin therapy for T2D patients have been model-based (e.g., Markov modeling simulation) analyses that used data mainly derived from clinical trials that assessed short-term drug efficacy in terms of biomarker changes among highly selective and homogenous patient populations [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%