1990
DOI: 10.1002/jcu.1870180707
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The contribution of sonography to the measurement of intra‐abdominal fat

Abstract: A study was conducted on a group of 50 obese females with a mean body mass index of 39 +/- 16, aged 19 years, in order to determine if sonography could be adopted as a direct means for measuring intra-abdominal fat deposits. Adipose tissue evaluation was performed by computed tomography (CT) and ultrasonography (using 3.5-MHz and 5-MHz probes) at the L4 level. CT intra-abdominal fat area (VAT) and ultrasonography visceral thickness from abdominal muscle to aorta were the values mainly considered. Ultrasonograp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
157
0
24

Year Published

1997
1997
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 216 publications
(190 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
9
157
0
24
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, it has been used to measure subcutaneous [18][19][20] and preperitoneal fat 21,22 as well as visceral thickness (distance between anterior abdominal wall and anterior surface of aorta). 7,21,23 The abdominal wall fat index expressed as a ratio of preperitoneal to subcutaneous fat thickness has been developed to assess the relationships between adipose tissue and obesity-related complications. 1,7,22 These sonographic measurements or indexes also showed significant associations with fatty liver or cardiovascular risk factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, it has been used to measure subcutaneous [18][19][20] and preperitoneal fat 21,22 as well as visceral thickness (distance between anterior abdominal wall and anterior surface of aorta). 7,21,23 The abdominal wall fat index expressed as a ratio of preperitoneal to subcutaneous fat thickness has been developed to assess the relationships between adipose tissue and obesity-related complications. 1,7,22 These sonographic measurements or indexes also showed significant associations with fatty liver or cardiovascular risk factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intra-abdominal fat/ subcutaneous fat ratio (VSR) was also computed. The total adipose tissue area (AT) and the visceral AT area were obtained by predictive formulae according to Armellini et al 17,18 Blood pressure parameters Starting at 08.00 am and following an overnight fast all patients underwent 24 h Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM) with a non-invasive device (Takeda-TM 2420/TM 2020, rev. 7, Japan), 25 using a large cuff size (45 cm 6 23 cm).…”
Section: Obesity Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, its relatively inconsistent inter-and intraoperator reproducibilities are major shortcomings. 7,8 Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) provides a relatively rapid and accurate assessment of total body fat with relatively low radiation exposure but does not directly quantify VAAT. [9][10][11] Whereas CT provides more accurate estimation of VAAT, subjects are exposed to ionizing radiation, which makes it unsuitable for large-scale research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%