2001
DOI: 10.1080/02699930126095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The contribution of speech rate and pitch variation to the perception of vocal emotions in a German and an American sample

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

4
56
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
4
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We approach this question by conducting a production and a perception experiment with different tone groups. For the purpose of this study, we test two emotions (happiness and sadness) highly associated with pitch movement and range (Breitenstein et al, 2001;Pereira, 2000;Scherer and Oshinsky, 1997). These two emotions differ in physiological arousal, which is associated with a subjective sense of energy ranging from lethargic to hyperactive (Thelwall et al, 2010) and is reported in the literature as the most consistent association with vocal pitch (e.g., Bachorowski, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We approach this question by conducting a production and a perception experiment with different tone groups. For the purpose of this study, we test two emotions (happiness and sadness) highly associated with pitch movement and range (Breitenstein et al, 2001;Pereira, 2000;Scherer and Oshinsky, 1997). These two emotions differ in physiological arousal, which is associated with a subjective sense of energy ranging from lethargic to hyperactive (Thelwall et al, 2010) and is reported in the literature as the most consistent association with vocal pitch (e.g., Bachorowski, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RESEARCH in speech prosody has shown that sadness is associated with a number of acoustical cues including slower speaking rate, quieter voice, lower overall fundamental frequency, lower spectral centroid, and smaller pitch variance (e.g., Banse & Scherer, 1996;Breitenstein, van Lancker & Daum, 2001;Davitz, 1964;Fairbanks & Pronovost, 1939;Siegman & Boyle, 1993). Of the various factors studied, loudness has been shown to be an especially reliable indicator when assessing the emotional state of a speaker (Yildirim et al, 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past century, dozens of formal experiments have confirmed all of the features he described. Sad speech exhibits a quieter dynamic level (Skinner, 1935;Scherer, 1986;Siegman & Boyle, 1993;Banse & Scherer, 1996;Cowie et al, 2001); sad speech is slower in tempo (Siegman & Boyle, 1993;Breitenstein, van Lancker & Daum, 2001); sad speech is lower in pitch (Fairbanks & Pronovost, 1939;Lieberman & Michaels, 1962); sad speech is more monotone (Skinner, 1935;Fairbanks & Pronovost, 1939;Eldred & Price, 1958;Davitz, 1964;Huttar, 1968;Williams & Stevens, 1972;Bergmann, Goldbeck & Scherer, 1988;Banse & Scherer, 1996;Sobin & Alpert, 1999;Breitenstein, van Lancker & Daum, 2001;); sad speech exhibits more mumbled articulation (Dalla Bella, Peretz, Rousseau, & Gosselin, 2001); and sad speech displays a darker timbre (Ohala, 1980(Ohala, , 1994Tartter, 1980;Scherer, Johnstone, & Klasmeyer, 2003, Table 23.2; Schwartz, Howe, & Purves, 2003;Ross, Choi, & Purves, 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%